Many candidates are prone to make mistakes when reviewing mathematics. Many candidates disdain the basic things, thinking that these contents are simple and don't need to review hard. Some candidates just "look" at it and feel that they can understand it, and rarely write questions. As a result, they are familiar with the final exam and it is difficult for them to get good grades. Therefore, when reviewing mathematics, we must be down-to-earth and step by step, just like playing chess. If you want to win the enemy's teacher, you must defeat all the teams honestly, slowly, slowly and steadily, step by step. Only in this way can we keep changing and take the initiative in the final test!
Foundation is the premise of promotion, and the importance of foundation is self-evident, but it is not enough to focus only on foundation. If you pay too much attention to the basics, you will stick to books and it will be difficult to adapt to the postgraduate entrance examination questions. The purpose of laying a good foundation is to improve. But paying too much attention to improvement will lead to a weak foundation, which will lead to top-heavy and inadequate. Candidates should understand the dialectical relationship between foundation and improvement, arrange the review progress reasonably according to their own situation, and handle the relationship between laying the foundation and improving their ability.