Yang Zhenning said: "The end point of physics is philosophy, and the end point of philosophy is religion. Chinese physicist Li Zhengdao said: "Aesthetics is the end of physics, philosophy is the end of aesthetics, and theology is the end of philosophy. "Briefly talk about my understanding: physics is a discipline that studies the most general laws of material movement and the basic structure of material. And this research process needs a lot of mathematical progress, just like many great physicists in history are mathematicians. If many physical problems reach a certain level, a mathematical method is needed to solve them, which eventually leads to the purpose of physical research is to study mathematics. Mathematics is a subject that studies concepts such as quantity, structure, change, space and information. This can be said to be the most basic problem. The fundamental problem of pursuing mathematics is the problem of rules in the field of philosophy. Mathematics mainly discovers the laws of nature and the laws of the world. Mathematics creates methods to study the essence and laws of its own existence. In the final analysis, this is also the world essence of philosophical research. Philosophy in a broad sense is a concrete qualitative study of universal and basic problems, most of which are related to reality, existence, knowledge, value, reason, mind and language. It can be said that the broad list of philosophy is very broad, and many basic disciplines such as mathematics, literature and psychology can eventually be attributed to philosophy. Theology: in a narrow sense, it refers to all studies or theories on the subject of God. Broadly speaking, it refers to all religious theological theories. I have to hehe, because I don't understand at all. And unpredictable. The in-depth study of philosophy and various disciplines has caused fundamental problems for the generation and material creation of the world. When all disciplines have not solved this ultimate problem, human beings can only attach this problem to an omnipotent object, which is God. And this is also the point where many human disciplines will eventually go, so theology is an end point. Personal understanding, limited level, do not spray if you don't like it! Excerpts from the following, it is difficult to fully understand this relationship without this experience. The following is an excerpt, which does not represent my point of view: physics is the law of the universe, and philosophy at this stage is only the product of human thinking, which is not comparable. Just a few thousand years of civilization, human beings want to sum up the universal philosophy of1375 million years? Too arrogant. In other words, physics is the end of philosophy and truth is the end of physics. Classical philosophy, for example, is the product of human thinking due to technical limitations and narrow vision. Modern philosophy, with its real practicality, is a summary of human nature in order to let people know the laws of physics and even the truth. Mathematics is the most powerful tool, physics is a constantly improving high-rise building, and philosophy is just one of the elevators, so that you can easily understand the truth of each floor. PS: To quote me, if philosophy can't explain mathematics, mathematics is meaningless to human beings. What is this statement? Mathematics needs philosophical explanation to be used? There is a philosophical saying about the relationship between philosophy and mathematics, which in turn illustrates the importance of mathematics to the establishment of philosophy. Others say that physics is only a few hundred years old. Physics is a subject that human beings sum up the world. As long as it is the bottom construction of the discipline, it is impossible to avoid philosophy. This needs to be more clear, we should never talk about the universe at the highest point, and all natural sciences do not exist because of human summary. A discipline that human beings cannot establish does not mean that other possible species cannot be established. Is it true that when other possible species established their natural science system, their world view was the same as ours? Their ideas are the same as ours? Others say that philosophy is the most likely to touch the truth of the universe, and this degree of brain supplement is unprecedented. . . To measure the truth of the universe by human world outlook, which researcher who pursues truth dares to say so? Others say that the research goal of philosophy is truth, so I ask, what is philosophy? Philosophy is aimed at people and is applicable to people. Philosophy is the theoretical system of people's world outlook. It is magnified that everyone has a set of philosophy, which is the way of thinking of every human individual. But can you study truth with philosophy? Humans can use a set of philosophical things to study inorganic nature. Can human beings use philosophy to study organic nature other than human species? Can human beings use philosophy for logical observation and reasoning? Can humans use philosophy to predict the 62 basic particles of the hottest particle standard model? Throughout the development history of natural science, whether in ancient China or in the modern west, natural science has been badly pitted by the so-called philosophy. In China for three thousand years, the development of natural science is not as good as that in the west for hundreds of years. Why? How much time has the western natural science been delayed by the so-called philosophy? At the end of 19, before the two dark clouds of physics were solved, the sentence said: "The physical building has been built, and the future work is only interior decoration and painting, but there are still two dark clouds floating over the building. "The first half of this sentence was said by Thomson with his own worldview, and the last sentence was the challenge he faced as a scientific working group in the right position. For example, the 62 basic particles of the particle standard model are not based on philosophy, but on many existing theories, observation data and a lot of calculations. Countless calculations to determine the mass, energy, magnetic moment and spin of each particle; The mass obtained by each particle under the excitation of field quantization; Principle and coagulation law of each particle at high temperature and low temperature; The interaction between each particle; The ideal quantum state of each particle; Regardless of whether each particle is responsible for the medium, transmission or composition, it is estimated that there are 62 basic particles that constitute the material world. Then through countless experiments to find every particle, you can't find it. You must find it under the same experimental conditions as you, and your experiment is correct. If someone says that the establishment of this standard model is based on philosophy, I think those researchers who come step by step will cry. In addition, as a physics graduate who has carefully studied five basic physics and four modern mechanics, as well as ferromagnetic, particle physics and quantum electrodynamics, I only think that too many people think of scientific research as simple and idealistic, and even many people think that philosophy is very important in natural science. This concept is completely wrong. Today's natural sciences are exploring the unknown step by step. It depends on the mathematical tools and experimental methods that no way of thinking will interfere with the interference results. What matters is the prohibition, the experimental results and the observation data. Now who dares to say that I rely on philosophy and my thoughts? To engage in philosophy, we should study the way of thinking of human beings and the ideological orientation of human society with peace of mind, and don't think that philosophy is truth. Perhaps some scientific research work does use some ways of thinking of philosophy, but insists that philosophy is the foundation, philosophy is the foundation, philosophy is the benchmark, and it is purely an empty bottle without water and ink hanging around.