Interview etiquette is very important. Proper dress and elegant conversation can not only leave a good first impression on the interviewer, but also enhance their self-confidence.
First, punctuality. No matter what reason you have, being late will be considered as a sign of lack of self-management and restraint. Candidates should arrive at the examination room in advance, use the time before the exam to adjust their nervous mood and adapt to the examination room environment quickly.
Second, the teacher's interview is very formal and serious, wearing a formal suit. Be sure to wear formal clothes to attend, not conservative and unconventional. Men had better wear a dark suit and tie; Women should choose more, but they should be neat, beautiful, steady and generous. The color, style and size of clothes should be in harmony with one's age, temperament, skin color, state and teacher's occupation, and should also be consistent with the subjects he teaches and the age of students. Such clothes will improve their professional quality.
Third, in the interview, we should put an end to such indecent gestures as shaking our legs, sticking out our tongues, turning our pens and reaching our fingers. These gestures can easily give the examiner the impression that the candidate is immature, unstable and unconfident, and naturally think that such a person is not suitable to be a teacher. During the interview, the intonation should be balanced, the speech speed should be gentle, the mixture of Chinese and English should be avoided as far as possible, and auxiliary words such as "la", "le" and "na" should be used as little as possible, so as not to leave the judges with vague, lengthy, sloppy and unconfident impressions.
Second, the principle of calmness and improvisation.
Interviewers pay more attention to the flexibility of candidates to cope with changes in the situation, and candidates should be fully prepared for this. For example, when you enter the interview room, the examiner smiles at you without asking questions, which makes you feel at a loss and nervous. At this time, you can "actively" change this passive situation. You can introduce yourself first, and even ask some questions to the examiner to show that you are flexible, witty and resourceful.
Generally speaking, after the examiner asks questions during the interview, candidates should think about it a little and don't have to answer in a hurry. Even if the questions you ask are similar to those you prepared in advance, don't answer them immediately, because that may give the examiner the impression that you are not using your brain to answer questions, but memorizing your prepared answers. If it is a topic you have never touched before, you should think calmly. Sharpening a knife without mistaking a woodcutter and rushing to answer questions may lead to incorrect writing, rambling or disorganized writing, and grabbing at eyebrows and beards. After thinking, grasping the main points and answering questions clearly will leave a good impression on the examiner.
Third, the principle of seeking truth from facts.
Seeking truth from facts means that when answering the examiner's questions, we should proceed from my actual situation, not exaggerating or shrinking, and correctly respond to the examiner's questions. For example, when the examiner asks you about your family, you should tell it truthfully and simply. If you are asked how many courses you have taken at the undergraduate or graduate level, if you remember clearly, report truthfully. If you are not sure, just give a rough idea. Never make up a number at will. When asked about your strengths and weaknesses, you should be concise and don't say too much or too much.
When the interview involves professional knowledge, you should answer truthfully. If you can't answer the questions asked by the examiner, confess that you don't know and apologize, because one's knowledge is always limited. When you ask questions that you are familiar with, you should give full play to them.
Fourth, clear and definite principles
Logical thinking ability is an essential content in interview examination, and the level of this ability can be shown through the candidates' defense, and clarity and consistency are the concrete manifestations of this ability. It should be noted that the examiner does not look at what you answer, but at how you answer. This requires candidates to think logically after hearing the interview questions and then make logical statements. This kind of logic requires candidates to answer clearly, coherently, closely linked and echoed. Answer this and conquer the examiner.
Five, the principle of closely related topics
The defense must be answered according to the requirements of the test questions, and it is not allowed to answer irrelevant questions, nor to expand or narrow the content or scope of the test questions and questions at will. For example, some organizational questions clearly ask, "As a teacher, how did you plan this activity?" Many candidates begin to answer questions according to the answering routine without thinking, ignoring the way of asking questions. The result is counterproductive, leaving the examiner with the impression that this candidate will only copy mechanically, will not be flexible, and will not improvise when encountering problems. Therefore, we must answer the questions closely, take the questions as the center, and combine our own characteristics to innovate, so as to make breakthroughs and gains.
Six, well-founded, near the purpose of the principle.
Interview defense itself has the characteristics of theoretical examination, so candidates should have a certain theoretical height when answering questions. For example, answering questions should be well-founded, quoted and straight to the point, or the party's educational principles and policies, or the country's educational laws and regulations, or the new curriculum concept, or the famous sayings of educational celebrities, and so on. These all need a certain theoretical basis, and candidates should pay attention to the accumulation in this area.