It is unrealistic and unnecessary to buy all the math courses. Mathematics books are different from politics and English, so it is enough to choose one. Too many books make people dizzy. Besides, I have to attend training classes to review politics and English, and some people have to go to work to look after the children, so I don't have that much energy.
Mathematics books for postgraduate entrance examination on the market are all written according to the outline and teaching materials. Some people say that homogenization is similar. I don't agree with this view. The same ingredients, chefs will burn different flavors, not to mention advanced mathematics. Although there are many kinds of mathematics books for postgraduate entrance examination, the books written by Wendeng Chen, Jolin Tsai and Li Yongle have really become excellent works.
Mr. Wendeng Chen has been engaged in postgraduate mathematics counseling for many years and has rich experience. He emphasized induction and refinement, and paid attention to methods and skills. I quite agree with this pursuit. Because counseling books help students improve, otherwise they will lose their meaning. But there is a limit to everything. Is it too mechanized to pull mathematical problem solving to the height of thinking formula? Formula is a term in Go, and it is the best way to play chess that has been proved by practice. There are so many theorems in mathematics, but their applications are endless. If we can solve the problem in a few words, then everyone can learn math well. I think it's better for only a few people.
Professor Jolin Tsai once participated in the proposition work of graduate students' mathematics, but he seems unwilling to make it public. His book editing style belongs to the typical "Jiangnan style"-meticulous and dense. Students with a good foundation may feel a little verbose, but it is of great benefit to students with poor foundation. Jolin Tsai emphasized that mathematics needs more training, and practice makes perfect. A lot of knowledge is specious. I thought I would, but I won't. And the exam is to test whether you really understand. There are many problems in Cai's book. It would be nice if we could separate the key points from the reference. In this case, you can grasp the review progress according to the time, and grasp the big and put the small.
It should be mentioned that Teacher Cai's book was renamed. Co-authored the book "Mathematics Standards for Postgraduate Entrance Examination in 2009" with Wang Shian, the former leader of mathematics proposition, Hu Jinde, a proposition expert, and Cheng Qiyuan, a marking expert. This book inherits the advantages of Cai's original work, and introduces the probability and the line generation of Hu Jinde. At present, the quality of the whole book is unparalleled. They are not only the proposers of postgraduate entrance examination questions, but also the makers of marking standards; They have the most authoritative and essential understanding of postgraduate mathematics. Other people in the market are trying to figure out the proposer's intention when they publish the counseling book. Psychologically speaking, one's personal intention cannot be fully understood by others, so only the proposer can truly understand the essence of postgraduate mathematics. With this book, you can avoid detours. So I recommend this book to the candidates who took part in the postgraduate entrance examination in 2009.
Teacher Li Yongle's books are also very good. The details are between Chen Shu and Cai Shu. Although they are not as different as Chen Wendeng and Jolin Tsai, they combine some characteristics of them. For example, it emphasizes the difficulty of attack and the need for training to do problems. The preface is modest and simple, but the three famous schools on the cover are so eye-catching, which seems to be suspected of taking advantage of the situation. After all, writing this kind of counseling book represents an individual, not a school.