The general review of junior high school mathematics has gone through three rounds. In the first round of review, the following questions often appear:
1. Review is unplanned and inefficient, which is reflected in inaccurate key points, inappropriate details, low difficulty, and inaccurate grasp of the upper and lower limits of the outline and teaching materials.
2. The review is not solid, and there are many loopholes, which are reflected in the high score of 1), which is too difficult and loses a lot of basic knowledge. 2) The review speed is too fast, and there are countless problems in students' minds. It's too late to rework. There are many loopholes if you don't rework. 3) the requirements are too loose, the requirements for students are not implemented, and a large number of review materials are only sorted out and not corrected; No homework.
3. There are many questions, and the ability is not high, which is manifested in: 1) taking the title as the topic instead of the title method, being satisfied with the answers after solving the problem and ignoring the summary of the law of solving the problem. 2) The topics are out of order, not step by step. 3) Too many repetitive topics, resulting in a waste of time and energy.
In the second round of review, the following problems should be prevented:
1. Prevent the mechanical repetition of the first round of review.
2. To prevent simple questions, we should use the topic theory method.
3. Prevent too many problems
In the third round of review, the following problems should be prevented:
1. Do more exercises, practice instead of speaking.
2. Use review materials instead of coaches, do not prepare lessons, and the classroom organization is loose.
3. Only pay attention to knowledge counseling, not psychological training.