Special exercises to prevent overtime
We know that the multiple-choice questions and fill-in-the-blank questions, which occupy half of the mathematics test papers, are naturally the "big brothers" in the three types of questions (multiple-choice questions, fill-in-the-blank questions and solution questions). Whether these two kinds of questions can get high scores has a great influence on the mathematics scores of the college entrance examination.
Therefore, it is very necessary for candidates to have regular, quantitative and qualitative training in the later period. It is necessary to strengthen the training of multiple-choice questions and fill-in-the-blank questions, increase the training time, and avoid the situation of "time-saving mistakes" and "losing points over time".
2. Reorganization of regression basis
In the mathematics college entrance examination paper, four basic questions are basically stereotyped, namely, one of three choices, one of trigonometric series, one of probability and one of solid geometry. These big questions are the main positions for solving problems in the college entrance examination. In the past exams, quite a few students scored very low. They didn't lose points on difficult problems, but they had too many basic questions, which led to unsatisfactory results in the final exam.
Therefore, in the future review process, we should sort out the knowledge, return to the basics as much as possible, and reproduce the knowledge background and basic mathematical methods. Make sure to do a certain amount of basic problems every day, and constantly strengthen the training of solving basic problems, so that students can do and complete this part of basic problems correctly and get full marks.
3. Frequent interviews with key issues
In the later stage of review, in order to maximize the benefits of review in a limited time, we must pay attention to key questions and realize "focus interview". For several main parts of mathematics, such as functions and derivatives, trigonometric functions, series, solid geometry, analytic geometry and statistical probability, we should focus on reviewing key knowledge and be willing to spend time and energy.
In the review process, students should know whether their knowledge or problem-solving ability is defective. If defects are found, it is necessary to re-integrate relevant contents according to the methods and ways to solve the problem, and form a latitude and longitude map of knowledge and methods.
4. The next review is by no means a simple and repetitive process.
Find the best "fulcrum" problem group to improve the score, grasp the basic problem of "extra points" in the college entrance examination, grasp the "key" key module of knowledge, break through the "difficulty" of knowledge to analyze geometry and derivative problems, and do not leave "blind spots" in review and preparation.