Everyone wants to know whether it is a question of level or attitude. It is necessary and necessary to find out.

A, * * * beauty and ugliness knowledge:

People say that ugliness has no standard, but beauty has rules. Ugliness is as different as ugliness, but sometimes beauty is always the same.

Aesthetic ability varies from person to person, which is a personal subjective feeling, but also has * * * knowledge. Look at the current plastic surgery template and you will know that with big eyes, high nose and small cherry mouth, everyone has a set of knowledge about what beauty is.

Therefore, when the illustrations in the textbook are the opposite of beauty, we can't help thinking: How does the author understand beauty?

When we know the author's background, it is even more incredible.

The layout and illustrations are from Beijing Wu Yong Design Studio.

According to public information, Wu Yong, the head of the studio, graduated from the Decoration Department of the Central Academy of Arts and Crafts (now Tsinghua University Academy of Fine Arts), majoring in book binding. He used to be the director and professor of visual communication in Changjiang College of Art and Design of Shantou University, the deputy director of the book binding art committee of China Publishing Association, the graphic design art committee of China Artists Association and the AGI member of the International Federation of Designers.

There are also many glittering materials to prove that this author team is a god-class level in the industry.

As we all know, the author either conveys his understanding of beauty through his works or his criticism of dissatisfaction with the real world through his works.

Primary school textbooks are obviously not a stage to convey critical spirit, that is, to convey the author's understanding of beauty.

Is this the great god's understanding of beauty?

Let's also accept that this is acceptable?

Everyone feels that * * * knowledge is challenged, and what's more, they feel that they will be forced by * * * knowledge, so enthusiastic netizens have turned over their textbooks and made a horizontal comparison between the Chinese and mathematics illustrations in the People's Education Edition, plus a vertical comparison between the illustrations in previous textbooks. What fancy contrast wants to express is that we don't want to be forced to know.

Second, the attitude towards * * * knowledge:

Whether intentionally or unintentionally, it is an objective fact that illustrations are not beautiful. We also see that there are indeed some illustrations with indecent tendencies, and there are also some phenomena of grasping the edges.

All kinds of earth-plastic phenomena in our life show that we are tolerant of the world, and we have been emphasizing seeking common ground while reserving differences. We are not harsh, but we have a bottom line!

Primary school textbooks are mainly used by primary school students, who are about 6- 14 years old. The cognitive development of children in this period needs our adults' attention.

Therefore, the arrangement of our teaching materials needs strict examination.

When you see a cockroach at home, it means that there may be 100 cockroaches at home. ...

So everyone wants to know the author's attitude. What is the attitude of the editors?

Some voices say that netizens are online, some blame their parents for being too picky, and some criticize netizens for being thoughtless and patriotic. ...

But there have been incidents of poisoning textbooks in other areas before, and we just don't allow textbooks to be polluted a little!

What are we arguing about?

We just want to know whether it is a question of level or attitude!