1, the content selection is out of focus and I can't understand it.

It is obviously inappropriate to start learning three contents at the same time. In fact, it may be more appropriate to concentrate on learning a content first and then continue after learning it thoroughly. From this point of view, the "337 morning reading method" is neither scientific nor reasonable.

2. The reading plan is unbalanced and difficult to evaluate.

The reading times of "337 morning reading method" are different every week, and the results cannot be the same. It is difficult to evaluate whether it is a problem of students, a problem of methods, or a problem of textbook selection. An unsystematic method won't last for several years.

3. Inconsistent implementation results are difficult to sustain.

The content is out of focus, the frequency is inconsistent and the time changes greatly. The implementation effect will inevitably be discounted, which is beyond parents' control and unsustainable.

Second, from the perspective of parental operation: [Jimei R]

1, there is no standard for teaching materials, so it is difficult to choose.

The information shared online is varied. Regardless of science, rationality needs to be considered. What to learn is unclear, there is no standard, and there is no logic. Causes parents to choose anxiety.

2. Planning is complicated and difficult to operate.

The operation scheme of "337 Morning Reading Method" is complicated, so the arrangement should learn from the contents of "Ebbinghaus Memory Method", not to mention the practicality of "Ebbinghaus". Interested friends can watch and share it later. You can confuse people by entering the contents of the plan into the execution form.

3, the implementation of hands-on, difficult to implement.

It is unrealistic for parents to spend nearly an hour reading every morning. Most parents can't do it. If it is difficult to implement, it cannot be sustained.