The comprehensive evaluation of students' quality should start from students and take their development as the premise. It develops with the development of students. In addition, students participate in the whole evaluation process. While the evaluation process is democratic, it should also reflect the students' dominant position. The purpose of comprehensive quality evaluation is to guide more students to actively participate in learning and make our teaching activities truly change from teacher-centered to student-centered development. First, the evaluation content is 1, and the ideological and moral quality-based on the Code of Daily Behavior for Primary School Students, can basically reflect the daily performance of this quality. 2, scientific and cultural quality-different from previous test scores, we evaluate the situation of a child's subject, which is the element of subdividing the subject as much as possible. For example, the evaluation items of Chinese subject are divided into obedient, speaking, reading, composition, homework, literacy, writing, unit exercise, learning attitude, learning habits and so on, so that you can know the strengths and weaknesses of children in a certain subject q- in detail, so as to better educate and help. 3. Physical and mental quality-including physical health and mental health, to comprehensively evaluate students' physical and mental health. 4. Quality of practical skills-to investigate students' participation in public welfare activities or social activities, self-help, understanding and mastering simple information technology, and to reflect students' working attitude, habits and practical ability. 5. Footprints of success-record the success of children in a semester, including winning prizes in competitions, publishing works, and making small progress in learning. 6. Teachers and students speak freely-reflecting the interaction and communication between teachers and students. Teachers focus on evaluating children's personality and psychological characteristics and put forward ardent hopes; Students talk to their teachers about their views on study and life or their psychological needs. 7. Parents' Feedback-Please give us your comments or suggestions on school work or children's performance. We will take every reply seriously in order to improve our work better in the future. Second, the evaluation method 1. In real life and study, students will behave differently at home and in society. The initiative of evaluation should be the responsibility of the class teacher, and the evaluation of teachers, parents and students in various subjects accounts for a certain proportion.

2. The evaluation methods are diversified, and teachers can adopt various forms such as observation, home visits, questionnaires, tests, conversations and social surveys. Find out each student's strengths, potentials, weaknesses and development needs, and establish students' personal files. This work is a painstaking and long-term work.

3. The development of students' ideological and moral quality, scientific and cultural quality, physical and psychological quality and practical skills is graded and divided into four grades: "excellent, good, qualified and to be qualified"; The evaluation of students' behavior is expressed in qualitative language. Thirdly, the evaluation mechanism adopts multiple evaluation methods, such as self-evaluation, mutual evaluation, teacher evaluation, parent evaluation, etc., which appear in the form of grades, and is evaluated once every semester, and the overall evaluation is made upon graduation to evaluate the comprehensive quality grade of the students throughout the primary school stage.

1, teacher evaluation The class teacher combined with the teachers in each class and used the Student Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Manual to evaluate the students' performance at ordinary times. Explain the successful footprint and existing potential of each student, and put forward the shortcomings.

2. Before mutual evaluation, students should be trained and instructed to avoid generalizing. The head teacher should describe and explain the evaluation elements to ensure the accuracy of students' self-evaluation and mutual evaluation. Each student participates in the evaluation of other students in the class. According to the four grades of "A, B, C and D", students draw "√" on the options they think fit. After the students' mutual evaluation is completed, the class teacher is responsible for organizing the statistical analysis of students' mutual evaluation and getting the scores of each student. The reform of comprehensive evaluation of primary school students' quality is a big project, which needs our continuous exploration, reflection and improvement in practice. May our comprehensive evaluation reform become a mentor for students' healthy growth, make the evaluation accurate, fair and scientific, and really promote students' development.