(1) Lack of systematic understanding of the knowledge points reviewed and lack of thinking level when solving problems. The first round of review focuses on the excavation of basic knowledge points, and the math teacher will repeatedly emphasize the importance of foundation. If we don't pay attention to the systematic analysis of knowledge points, we can't form an overall knowledge network framework, and naturally we can't have an overall idea when solving problems, and we can't deeply understand the thinking methods of typical examples of college entrance examination.

(2) When reviewing, my heart is not quiet. A restless heart will lead to unclear thinking, and the review efficiency with unclear thinking is very low. It is suggested that before starting a review of a subject, you should calm down and seriously think about what you need to review next and how many things you need to do, and then do it seriously, and at the same time you need to concentrate, so that you can have good results.

(3) In the first round of review, the focus of study should be shifted to the basic review. Therefore, it is suggested that the majority of students should not rush for success in the first round of review, but must calm down, carefully ponder every knowledge point and understand every principle. Only in this way can a round of review be effective.