When introducing the sprint strategy of postgraduate entrance examination mathematics, our purpose is simple, that is, to let everyone achieve better review effect in the last 50 days. Generally speaking, sprint books are divided into two types, one is the real problem set, which is the most important; The second is a simulation question, no matter what name it appears. It is still very important to grasp and thoroughly understand the real questions, supplemented by simulation questions and strengthen the application skills of knowledge points, but simulation questions are not real questions after all and should not be too much.

The application of real questions is also a problem worthy of attention. Is it a set of things? Or do you want to do it in different questions? Different students have different methods, in short, as long as they can improve their ability to solve mathematical problems. What needs to be explained here is that if there is no good way, you can do this: do one or two sets first. If the score makes you feel uncomfortable, then give up one thing and do another, classify and conquer the questions, such as the real questions in the cross-examination and leave the real questions in the last few years to the mock exam. The classified questions are thoroughly done, and then one by one, which is equivalent to the second review of the real questions. If the score is ideal, then do one question at a time, that is, leave the real questions in recent years for simulation, and then do classified questions, which is equivalent to the second review of the real questions.

So how much time is appropriate for a day's math review? According to the candidates' situation and reference materials over the years, generally speaking, for mathematics, it takes more than two hours to review effectively. Combined with the actual situation of the exam, it is best to give mathematics three hours a day. This is relatively reasonable, of course, the review time depends on the specific situation. Up to now, students should be able to realize that the characteristic of a math topic for postgraduate entrance examination is that a topic contains two or more knowledge points, and the knowledge points are examined through comprehensive topics. It is very important to know this form, because when we do the problem, we must first learn to disassemble the problem, understand what the problem is and which test sites are composed of, then mobilize the corresponding knowledge points and start the corresponding problem-solving skills. Therefore, it is not our original intention to do real questions. The purpose is to study the composition of real questions and train problem-solving methods. When we were studying real questions, the teacher suggested that we should look at how to reflect the test sites in a topic and how to identify the tricks of these proposers from the perspective of thinking.

I would like to remind candidates that the more they go to the sprint stage of postgraduate entrance examination, the more they cannot relax. Attention should be paid to doing problems in the sprint stage of postgraduate mathematics: first of all, you must "do" the problems with your hands instead of "seeing" with your eyes. As the saying goes, "It is better to pass them once with your eyes"; Secondly, it is best to standardize the questions, use A4 paper to do the questions according to the actual situation of the exam, and plan the draft paper reasonably; Finally, we should start practicing psychological quality on the spot.

In fact, there are many online, and I just copy and paste them.