Personally, I think that Chen Wendeng's review guide is specially written for the postgraduate entrance examination. By default, you are very familiar with the textbook or have read a textbook in advance. The knowledge points of many topics in Chen Wendeng's books are interrelated. For example, the title of the first chapter will involve the knowledge of the third and ninth chapters, and it is not easy to get started without preparation.
Li Yongle's review book is written in parts, and the knowledge points are more detailed than those in the book. It is no problem to read the review book directly without reading the textbook. These examples are not as difficult as those in Chen Wendeng, but they are also typical. There is no need to do the following exercises, because these exercises are just a simple repetition of the previous examples (Li Yongle himself said).
So if you take the postgraduate entrance examination, it is recommended to find a correct one, because all parts of a book are related. For example, the number of lines requires knowledge of high numbers, which will directly tell you that the theorem in the previous chapter is quoted here. It's easy to be fooled by reading two books. You can read one of them at least twice before reading the other one (if you have time and energy).
There are two ways to review mathematics for postgraduate entrance examination: first, pay close attention to a book, read it repeatedly, and thoroughly understand every question and theorem. Second, do it one by one, and finish most review books and question banks on the market. But no matter which method, you must read the book reviewed for the first time carefully for more than two times. This is a dead beat, which is the way to ensure that the score crosses the line. To tell the truth, math problems are really not difficult, that is, each problem involves many knowledge points. When you review two months before the exam, you will find that the math exam is not clever thinking, but rote learning. Really, who remembers more, remembers prison, and associates in the examination room.
If we say the knowledge points of advanced mathematics, Chen Wendeng and Li Yongle's two review books are very comprehensive and fully reviewed, so we don't need to find other guidance books, because we can't remember theorems and formulas, it's useless to do more problems, and the probability is the same. Only the number of rows needs to do a lot of questions, because the number of rows is more complicated, so it needs to be strung together to form a framework, otherwise the number of rows will basically be abolished.
If you are preparing for the postgraduate entrance examination in your junior year, I suggest you make a plan first. Grab a book for math, English and politics, and don't look for one here and one there. Dig into a book and read it several times, and you will gain a lot. When I read it the second time, I can actually see my progress, and the exam is completely enough. It is best to do real questions and simulation questions, because many questions in the topic set are too tricky and difficult, and it is impossible to test real questions in the postgraduate entrance examination. This is a strange question. Each question in the real question will involve multiple knowledge points, but each knowledge point is not difficult. Therefore, ten-year real questions, Dr. Zhao's high number lecture notes, Li Yongle's line number lecture notes and a full-scale simulation of 400 questions, and 660 basic exercises are enough, and the probability is simple.
Finally, if you are a senior one and want to learn math, I admire you very much. I'll knock one for you first, and then I suggest you have a look at the translated version of Mathematical Analysis by Jimmy Dovich. But if you want to understand thoroughly, you need to do at least40,000 questions. Hehe, it is said that Ding said it. I wish you success, hehe. ...