What kind of people will take the postgraduate entrance examination?
Generally speaking, people who take the postgraduate entrance examination can be divided into two categories: one is graduates who should be bound in schools, and the other is social workers. As for which kind of person is more conducive to the postgraduate entrance examination, that is a matter of opinion. As a student at school, the advantage of review is that there is a good atmosphere, and there are many like-minded people around you who can exchange needed goods and experiences. More importantly, you won't feel lonely, but you will inevitably be influenced by various things at school. Studying alone at home after graduation, those months were unpleasant. It's hard to say whether I can persist alone if I don't have a few friends to take the exam together. Generally speaking, I think it's not a bad thing to try when I was a student. As mentioned later, if the arrangement is reasonable, the postgraduate entrance examination will not have a great negative impact on your class, job search and so on. Of course, you may have little time for entertainment, which can be said to be a price.
Can I take the postgraduate entrance examination if my grades are not good at ordinary times? It is definitely a misunderstanding that only those with good grades take the postgraduate entrance examination. A friend of mine often tells me that one of his classmates got poor grades, but somehow he was admitted to the graduate school of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. In fact, the postgraduate entrance examination tests your self-study ability to a certain extent, and the courses taught by teachers are also good, but when no one gives you advice, you must explore how to study more effectively. Some people may say, haven't you all taken postgraduate courses? I think, first of all, you may not remember what you have learned. Now everyone knows something about the classes in the university, especially how many people can listen to the classes like Ma Zhe and Allen carefully? Second, what I learned before may not be suitable for the postgraduate entrance examination. For example, in advanced mathematics, I took the number four test, and many previous key contents are now out of the scope of the test. Great changes have taken place in politics in recent years, and English has to be accumulated by ourselves. Some people think that going to some teacher remedial classes will reduce the blindness of review. I admit, those tutorial classes will help you clarify the key points and teach you answering skills, but you must not hope to pass. What he can do, a clear-headed person can do it himself. But if you don't know how to review or even read books, it's not a bad thing to go to class. This year's politics is an example: many pre-test classes (books) will list the so-called top priorities, and the three priorities claimed by Dr. Black I bought-Theory of Three Represents Theory, Governing the country by virtue and by law, and reforming the economic system-have not been tested. I'm not saying that they have no level and can't find the point. It's just that the person who gave the question is not a fool. The whole world is talking about this year's exam, but he still works hard to get in. Then don't give people a smile. On the contrary, the topic and distribution structure of Deng Xiaoping and Mao Zedong Thought are very basic, right? You can do it without memorizing. Did those teachers and remedial classes mention it? Therefore, the key to the postgraduate entrance examination lies in oneself.
How to prepare for postgraduate entrance examination
I often see people on the internet discussing how much time it takes to review. Some people have been preparing since they first entered the university. I think most people start from the summer vacation of their junior year. I can't give you the exact time, but I can tell you my experience as a reference. I graduated in July, 20001year and took the postgraduate entrance examination in June, 2002. Before that, I never thought about taking the postgraduate entrance examination. To be exact, I was forced to take the postgraduate entrance examination. If I can find a satisfactory job, I don't think I will take the postgraduate entrance examination. "9 1 1" was still looking for a job in Shanghai, and 10 began to make plans in this regard under the persuasion of friends. /kloc-I bought a tutorial book for the postgraduate entrance examination at the end of 0/0 (it should be noted that I studied advanced mathematics in my freshman year, and I lost it after I finished it, and my English level is also very average). I bought a tutorial book from Chen Wendeng, and I took a fancy to its content (book thickness) because there were no textbooks for linear algebra and probability theory. Politics bought books jointly published by several cram schools, that is, the kind with red covers and very, very thick ones. The reason is that I don't have a textbook, so I need to find a book with substantial content. /kloc-in February, I bought three more reciting editions of Dr. Black (lost money), but I didn't buy any English books.
My review life will start from 10. 10 month, 1 1 month basically watch for three to four hours every day, and when you enter1February, you feel that the situation is grim. I watch it for about six hours a day, and January is almost the same. Because I am very sleepy, I sleep 10 to 12 hours every day, and I am also fascinated by football. I have seen the Champions League, Serie A, Bundesliga and La Liga. I have never missed the Golden Cup in Central and North America in January, and I have to surf the Internet for an hour every day. By calculation, there is not much time left for me to read.
The key is how my grades are, otherwise what's the point of my experience? If the results come out, I think it's "Monday morning quarterback". Although I don't know the result yet, I roughly estimate it at around 350. It's a bit difficult to have only English in a single subject, but there is still great hope for a score above 55. According to last year's score line, the probability of going online is still relatively large.
Of course, I didn't go to a first-class university like Peking University Tsinghua, but I'm not a nameless "rotten school". It is also a "2 1 1" university, ranking more than 20 in the country. Even if I didn't get in this year, I would like to say to those friends who are interested in the postgraduate entrance examination, "Don't make the postgraduate entrance examination too mysterious, in fact, that's all."
How to deal with basic courses
There is a view that there are actually only three courses in postgraduate entrance examination, namely, three basic courses: politics, English and mathematics. My feeling is that if you are majoring in economics and finance, this sentence is quite reasonable. My postgraduate entrance examination is to recite the books of professional courses for three times before taking the exam. I think I did well in the exam. For another example, one of my classmates is not good at math, so he deliberately chose a major that doesn't need to take math exams-journalism and communication, three professional courses and two basic courses. As long as you can play this kind of professional course, the score will not be too low, and it will not have much impact if you have not studied it. We can also learn from this practice of seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages.
1 politics
First of all, I want to put forward my personal opinion: liberal arts politics is better than science politics. Generally speaking, the liberal arts has an additional course "World Politics and Economy". How can it be better? You can look at the exam questions over the years. In fact, this part is inseparable from several themes: American hegemonism, world economic globalization and environmental protection. In addition, according to China's foreign policy, we should pay due attention to the international hot issues in recent years. It can be said that it has contained most of the content. Of course, these are not enough, but we should pay attention to the following points: (1) The content of history examination in politics is getting less and less, and a large part of World Politics and Economy describes the history of world development after the war. In fact, we don't need to recite carefully like philosophy, Mao Zong and Allen, just look at it a little and get a little impression. (2) Even if you pass the exam, you can't get rid of some topics. For example, "Socialism is better than capitalism" is never wrong, and "America is the natural representative of hegemonism" is inevitable. With this, we have the initiative.
Of course, my point of view also has a premise-I have a good world political and economic foundation. It's not that I have done in-depth research, but that I must read the Yangtze Evening News every day (just because I'm from Jiangsu, not because it's particularly good). I'm not simply browsing. I must read most articles carefully. I am interested because I can broaden my horizons and increase my knowledge. Do you think that after nearly 89 years of this habit, my views on international affairs and my understanding of international politics and economy will still be at the same level as others? What's more, I often read reference news and Global Times, and I usually read some books in this field, which makes it easier to review.
So one of my suggestions is not to turn a deaf ear to things outside the window, but to buy a newspaper to read, which can relax your mood and help you study. Why not? Some people may say that this practice takes time to accumulate and may not have obvious effects. Is it worth it for those points? In my opinion, this is not only for politics, but also for some professional courses in English and liberal arts. Don't believe it? For example, there is an article about euthanasia in English reading comprehension this year. You know, the theme of euthanasia often appears in newspapers. There is a high demand for legalization of euthanasia in Europe and America, but the attitude of governments in various countries is relatively conservative. It seems that only the Netherlands in Europe has legislative permission. If you read the article in this background, will it help you understand the article? Better than a nerd who doesn't even know what euthanasia is. Can't we use the economic reports and comments in newspapers and magazines when we do the essay questions in professional courses? Of course, you have to take an economics major.
Besides, there are more liberal arts, so other topics such as philosophy, introduction and Allen will inevitably be reduced. If "world politics and economy" is the main topic, then other topics may be a little more difficult than science. However, in recent years, the topics of arts and sciences are developing in the same direction, and in fact, there is no difference in the difficulty of similar topics in arts and sciences, but the topics themselves are very different. I don't think there is any difficulty comparability on the basis of this difference. Because everyone's books are the same, maybe you have invested too much in this area and understood it deeply, so you just got it, or maybe you didn't get it, which is useless. This aspect varies from person to person.
Let's be specific. The last quarter of philosophy is the biggest headache when I review, because it is too abstract. Fortunately, the person who writes questions is also very open (he seems to know that ordinary people can't reach this level, hehe). He won't write that abstract philosophical theory, but will focus on the application of the theory. He may never test your basic methods of dialectical thinking, induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, abstraction and concreteness, logic and history. He is more willing to test how you see philosophy in one thing, and it is often a big problem. Therefore, my approach in this respect is to "grasp the big and let go of the small" in big aspects, such as the three laws of philosophy, materialism and idealism, and the nature of cognition. Because these things are bound to be tested, some things may be tested, but they are difficult to understand and time-consuming, so I simply look at the definition and spend more time on the key points.
Marxist political economy is my favorite subject, because I studied economics in college, so I just spent some time reciting definitions and theories. Actually, I don't think this chapter is difficult. Recite mainly on the basis of understanding, which will get twice the result with half the effort. Generally speaking, this part of the analysis questions is the best, but unfortunately it is rarely discussed, and the total proportion is only 15% to 18%.
Mao Jue and Allen, I think the former pays more attention to the elaboration of history, while the latter pays more attention to the combination with reality, probably because of the relationship of the times. Because, in principle, the content of the examination of China's revolutionary history should be less and less, but not necessarily. In the liberal arts volume of 200 1, there is only one topic, which is a test of China's successful experience in socialist transformation of individual agriculture and the duality of China's national bourgeoisie. I think this kind of topic is easier to understand than reciting. What about this year? I remember that in the single choice, there is one thing that Zhou Enlai opposes, and in many choices, it is the most important thing that Mao Zedong opposes. Hey! I think people who can recite all these things should be called experts. I didn't mention it in that thick book anyway. I really don't know where to find it! Let's talk about the composition question again. I think Ding Zhaozhong's speech at 200 1 was very good. I thought there should be similar questions this year, but I didn't expect two very dull questions this year. I think everyone can get the basic score and distribution structure of Deng Xiaoping and Mao Zedong Thought. The key is to be able to answer comprehensively and cover all aspects. Anyway, I just tried my best, and I won't stop until I write a blank oath, hehe. Compared with last year, this year's essay questions did not inspire candidates' thinking, nor did they combine the analysis ability of realistic hotspots, which can be said to be a failure! I don't want to say more about the material problem. Everyone has the material in hand, and it can't be much worse. Blow whatever you see from the material. I don't believe you can blow environmental protection into martial law. You have to get some points.
Some people may ask, according to you, how can politics be so easy? It's easy for me to say, but it's relative. It is easy to get 55 points (the highest in the past years), but it is difficult to get high marks. Let's get this straight. We can't ask for a simpler single choice. Most people should be above 12, right? Even if you don't get the lowest, you will be lucky in the next multiple selections. So how many channels should I choose? My opinion is half, that is, 7 to 8 questions, usually 8 questions. If you are lucky enough to achieve 9, you earn it. The key to making multiple choices is to grasp one end and the other. The first few topics are mainly philosophy and political economy, and they won't be difficult. The next few topics are world politics, economy and current politics, which are the key points of grading. Suppose the first five questions get three to four questions, the last five questions get three to four questions, usually six to eight questions, and then the middle five questions get 1-2 questions. After deducting the mistakes, is it difficult to answer questions 7-8 correctly all the time? Now let's look at the score again. 12 plus 14( 16) should be 26-28. Suppose you only get half the score in the discussion and materials, then it is 46-48. What is the difference? According to 55, it is 7-9 points, but the previous calculation is based on the minimum target, and the scoring rate has been very high over the years. It's very basic to get half a point. Is it difficult to get 55 points after that? In fact, generally speaking, politics should be below 65 points. Of course, this does not apply to friends who aim at Tsinghua Peking University.