Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - Which subject determines a child's IQ: Chinese, Mathematics or English?
Which subject determines a child's IQ: Chinese, Mathematics or English?
Whether it is junior high school, senior high school entrance examination or college entrance examination, in terms of importance, there are three subjects that have been in a "three-legged" situation.

The math teacher thinks that "those who get math get the college entrance examination", because of the three subjects, math is the easiest one to score.

Not to be outdone, Chinese teachers bluntly say that "those who get Chinese get the college entrance examination", because those senior three candidates who can be admitted to the top 985 universities are basically super scholars with good Chinese.

Of course, English teachers are naturally quite unconvinced by the two views of Chinese and math teachers ... then the question comes: which subject is more difficult to teach, Chinese, math or English? Next, I, a front-line teacher, will tell you the truth!

I think Chinese is the most difficult of the three subjects to teach. This is not only because I am a Chinese teacher, but also because of the following three reasons:

First of all, Chinese teachers correct homework the most. In correcting homework, English teachers should be more relaxed, so let's compare Chinese and math subjects: math teachers usually change a workbook and an exercise book, plus some papers in the usual exams, so there is basically no other homework to be corrected.

However, the amount of Chinese homework is obviously much more than that of math homework: students' compositions should be approved in full (including grades, dates, eyebrows, general comments and encouraging words), and homework books, writing books, diaries, small exercise pens, dictation homework, quizzes, unit papers and review papers … these homework should be corrected basically.

Take primary school as an example. In addition to school leaders, other Chinese teachers should also serve as class teachers in nine cases out of ten. It is estimated that only the relevant "director" can know how hard and tired it is to be a class teacher. Therefore, no matter the workload or the amount of homework correction, Chinese teachers occupy an overall disadvantage.

Secondly, it is difficult for students to make immediate progress in Chinese subjects. As long as you have a strong interest in mathematics, as long as you listen carefully in class, finish your homework carefully and study in the right way, you are likely to want to get high marks or make progress in mathematics (except for students with serious IQ arrears). However, only by studying hard can we achieve better results in Chinese. Moreover, listening carefully in Chinese class will never lead to good grades. Chinese learning is generally "learning in class, benefiting in class"-not only listening carefully in class, but also spending a lot of time reading and accumulating diligently outside class. The accumulation of Chinese language sense can never be achieved overnight.

Third, there are many subjective questions in Chinese examination. As we know, in two subjects, math and English, if the topic is done right, it is done right. The subject of Chinese is inferior to any other subject in the weight of subjective questions: the composition score of Xiaoshengchu (full mark of Chinese 100) is between 30 and 40, and the composition score of our senior high school entrance examination and college entrance examination (full mark of Chinese 150) has reached 60. The subjective score of the composition is so objective, but how many subjective questions are there in reading? It is estimated that only the Chinese teacher who participates in marking papers every time knows best.

The more subjective subjects, the more difficult it is to teach. At least Chinese teachers should teach students how to achieve excellent results in every Chinese exam, even if they use up their "wild power", they may not get what they want.