Preheating stage: during and before the summer vacation, read books when you are free and interested, with the aim of preheating, no matter how much you read. But in fact, you can see more or less. Don't be too hard on yourself during this time, because there is still a lot of time. At the same time, individuals feel that they have entered the high-intensity review state too early, which is likely to cause fatigue and boredom in the later period and affect the passion and energy of reviewing for the exam.

Basic review stage (1): I entered this stage from September 1. At this time, it has entered the high-intensity review stage. During this time, I mainly read Chen Wendeng's review guide. This is a book with a thickness of over 400 pages. My evaluation of this book is "extensive and profound", which not only summarizes all the basic knowledge and concepts required by the outline, but also collects many examples and exercises, including the real questions of the postgraduate entrance examination over the years. Therefore, after preheating, reading this book in a down-to-earth manner is very beneficial to master and understand the basic knowledge and problem-solving ideas. When reading this book, you should pay attention to:

1) You must master and understand the basic knowledge and concepts carefully. If you don't understand them, you must explain them clearly with the help of auxiliary materials. Only then can you look at the examples and exercises.

2) For each example and exercise, you must do it yourself before reading the answers and solutions, then summarize and reflect on the answers and solutions in the book, and write down your feelings next to it. Mark the topic with different marks. At that time, I was mainly divided into three situations: one was what I could do; Second, you have the right idea, but you don't write it completely, or you don't do it right; Third, I have no right ideas and no wrong ideas. Doing these marks well can make your follow-up review more targeted.

3) Be sure to write a good title. You can do the experiment by yourself, understand a problem, and when you feel there is no problem, try to write it down smoothly with the notebook you recite. I believe that most people can't do it. So I strongly suggest that you get into the habit of doing things at the beginning of review, which is the only criterion to test whether you have mastered it completely.

4) Be sure to pay attention to the summary. When looking at concepts and knowledge points, underline some key words; For those who don't know much at first, write your own understanding after understanding. When doing the problem, you should also write down why you couldn't do it at that time, what kind of typical problems you should see in the future, and what kind of reactions and ideas you should have.

5) As I said just now, Chen Wendeng's thick books are profound and contain many difficult problems, so you will encounter many difficulties and even torture when reviewing for the first time. At this time, I need to tell myself that this is normal. Imagine if you read this book easily as soon as you get it. I don't think it is necessary to review it. Personally, although I got 14 1 in the final exam, I still feel very painful at this stage. At this time, we must not lose heart, we must persist and move forward step by step. When you encounter a problem that you really don't understand, let it go first. If there is an opportunity, you can get to know them by consulting teachers, classmates or consulting materials. In fact, some problems will be "suddenly enlightened" in future review.

Basic review stage (2): This stage and the first stage can be carried out alternately. Personally, the second phase will start at the end of September. This stage is mainly to use the opportunity of the remedial class to "sweep" the basic knowledge of mathematics for the second time. Because of the foundation of the first stage, I had a certain impression when I attended the remedial class, so I could basically keep up with the teacher's rhythm. After class, combine the class notes and Chen Wendeng's review guide to consolidate it again. I feel that the alternation of these two processes has given me a better understanding and mastery of most basic knowledge.

Experience stage of real questions: this stage is mainly about experiencing the difficulty of real questions and solving ideas. I only spent 65,438+0 weeks at this stage, because most of the real questions (especially the big questions) have been read in Chen Wendeng's review guide, and there is no great need to "go through it with a real knife". In this regard, I mainly look at the big topic, make a fuss about time, and feel it. The experience and judgment at that time was that the real question was actually not difficult. As long as you are careful and pay attention to speed, you can get high marks.

After reviewing the above three stages (about165438+1mid-October), I found a rather troublesome problem, which I believe everyone will encounter. This is: most things in books can be understood, but there are too many things, which are easy to forget and difficult to write when doing problems; At the same time, I feel that a thick book is forgotten after reading the front and back, and forgotten after reading the front and back. In view of this situation, I think it can only be solved by strengthening training, so I entered the simulation stage of the set of questions. At this stage, every time you do a set of simulation questions, you can review the important contents of all chapters. Although you can't cover every knowledge point, you can review those important knowledge at will. I think this is much better than reading a thick book over and over again and coming back once a month or two.

The following principles should be followed in the simulation stage of the problem set:

1) must be timed (3h/ set) to simulate the examination room. You may not understand without doing a set of questions. Running for three hours at high intensity is still very tiring.

Some people say that if there is not enough training before the postgraduate entrance examination, it is difficult to adhere to the four consecutive exams, and even if you sit on it, it is difficult to ensure your status. I remember when I finished that set of questions for the first time, I felt a light feeling when I walked. Really tired. But with more exercise, sitting for three hours becomes a habit.

2) You must stop answering questions and then grade yourself against the answers. Only in this way can we be more aware of our situation and put pressure on ourselves.

3) After each set of simulation questions is finished, arrange enough time for a comprehensive, systematic and detailed summary, which usually exceeds the time for doing the questions, that is, more than 3 hours. I once said that the process of summarizing is actually the process of storing knowledge in your brain in an orderly way. Don't just look at the answer and say "so that's it". If you treat it this way, I believe that some questions may not be mastered after three times. The final result may be that you come down from the examination room and hear the same "so that's it" when you see the answer, but you may add a "TMD".

4) Every time you do several sets, you need to go back and summarize your knowledge points, chapters and topic types that are prone to problems, analyze the reasons and formulate countermeasures. When necessary, special training can be carried out with the help of auxiliary materials to make a breakthrough.

By doing the above, I believe I will gain a lot every time I finish a set of questions.

The number of sets of questions should be determined according to the strength distribution and progress of each subject, and adjusted appropriately in the review process. At that time, I prepared 15 sets of questions about Chen Wendeng and 400 sets of questions about Li Yongle (10 sets). This number itself is relatively large, because I am not confident in my math ability. However, in the initial stage of the set of questions, that is, in the process of doing Li Yongle 400 questions, I found it very painful to do it. Small questions (fill in the blanks and choose) take about 90 minutes, and the remaining half will be spent on big questions. Some of them can't do it, and some know the way of thinking, but they can't write it. They finally met something simple and even made a mistake. At the same time, the result is worse. 10 sets of questions have an average score of more than 70, and the high score is only about 90. This situation has seriously hit my confidence. What should I do? I think, since I can't do that set of questions, I must do it, or I will die in the exam. So, I bought a new 400-topic book and did it the second time step by step according to the original method. The result this time is more than 120 on average. Some people may say, how can you not get full marks for what you do? My answer is, you try. This phenomenon is more telling. You must do more. What you have seen and done may not be in your hands. Only when you pick up a pen can you write fluently, is what you really master.

After this stage, that is, after completing two 400 questions, I feel a little better and more confident. At this time, I started to make Chen Wendeng's 15 sets, and the average result was more than 1 10, which was relatively stable. It takes about 50 minutes to make a small question (the final exam only took 34 minutes). I am very satisfied with this result, and I feel that I can get 120 in the formal exam (I know that the real question is simpler than the simulation question).

Here I also want to talk about my feelings about these two sets of questions. Li Yongle's 400 questions are mainly routine questions, while Chen Wendeng's 15 set will have some "strange questions", which rarely appear at ordinary times. In terms of difficulty, I feel that Li Yongle is slightly more difficult as a whole (for example, the calculation of some fill-in-the-blank questions is equivalent to a big question), while Chen Wendeng's is relatively simple except for "strange questions". In a word, I think both books are very good. If the research friends have time, I think it is necessary to do both books. If there is not enough time, it is suggested to do a good job in Li Yongle, which is more helpful to train them to think about conventional problems.

State maintenance phase: this phase intersects with the problem setting phase. At this time, it has reached the final period of review for postgraduate entrance examination. The time for political and professional courses has increased, while the time for math review has decreased relatively. Therefore, the frequency of doing sets of questions has decreased during this period, but it must be done at least 1 set 1 set every week to maintain a good state. At the same time, at this stage, we still need to remember some things, such as some difficult formulas, key knowledge and matters needing attention when reading books, and so on. This can avoid losing some points that should not be lost in the examination room.

These are some of my experiences and feelings in math review. Here are a few points to note:

1) Don't overemphasize Chen Wendeng's review guide: Many people think Chen Wendeng's book is very good, but some friends are addicted to it and read it several times, which is not desirable. In my opinion, the review guide is just a basic review tool, and you can learn a lot from it, but it can't replace the simulation of that set of questions and can't effectively train your fast output ability. In addition, it is difficult to review a lot of contents in the guide. If you are too entangled in it, you will lose more than you gain.

2) Don't overemphasize the real questions over the years: Since other review materials have already included the real questions over the years (such as Chen Wendeng's review guide), it is not the first time for you to see the real questions over the years. If you do a set of exercises with it, the result will give you inaccurate information and mislead you to judge yourself. If you don't have to watch the whole set of simulations all day, it will also delay your time and affect your training of fast output ability. I have a friend who studies well, but rarely does problems and spends a lot of time studying real problems. As a result, he felt very uncomfortable in the examination room, and his score was less than 80.

3) Don't overemphasize the amount of questions: doing questions, especially doing sets of questions, is an effective means to train the speed and accuracy of exams. However, if we overemphasize the figures, we will only get twice the result with half the effort if we do not sum them up properly. Besides training speed, you can't effectively improve your ability to solve problems, so you can't effectively improve the accuracy of solving problems. So, after you finish that set of questions, you must make a good summary and make the questions you have done become the ones you have mastered, otherwise, how much you will know now, or you will only know so much later.

4) Don't overemphasize difficult questions and digressions: I have repeatedly stressed that the real exam questions are not difficult, and most (even all) are routine questions. Therefore, what we need to improve in the review is the ability to solve problems quickly (that is, we can write out the questions quickly when we see them; If this state is not reached, even if it can be worked out in the end, it will delay the time to solve other problems. Excessive pursuit of difficult problems and off-topic in review will not only make you lose confidence, but also waste your precious review time, which may not be used in the examination room in the end.

Finally, I would like to talk to you about the precautions in the examination room.

1) make a plan for yourself according to statistical data (such as time allocation, hit rate of each part of each question type, etc.). ) When doing simulation questions at ordinary times, such as how much time to plan for small questions (fill in the blanks, multiple-choice questions), what to do first for big questions, what to do later, and so on. If you have a score, it will be easier.

2) Hit rate first, speed second. This truth needs no explanation. Only when you do it right can you score.

3) Pay attention to the order of solving problems. A minor problem is a simple problem, and here it is mainly aimed at a major problem. In principle, we should follow the principle of easy before difficult, give enough time and emotion to simple questions, and try to eat them all. There are several ways to determine the order. One is based on experience. For example, if you think the line generation is simple and the score rate is high every time, you can take the test first. The second is to look at the test paper roughly and determine a problem-solving order; The third is to "bleed one by one" according to the natural order, put aside when encountering difficulties or troubles, and continue to do the following things.

4) Learn to give up. Don't embarrass yourself during the exam. When you encounter a problem, you must finish it. This is a period of poor grades. Our task in the exam is to get as high a score as possible in a limited time, so when we encounter difficulties, we might as well put it down and do some simple things first. Besides, you can't panic when you encounter problems. We must form such a view, we don't need full marks, it's normal to lose points. As long as you do the right questions and avoid low-level mistakes, you can get considerable scores.

These are some of my feelings in math review and exams. I can't say it's completely correct, but at least it's from the heart. It will be my greatest comfort if I can give some inspiration to my fellow researchers.

I believe that through a semester's hard work, you can walk into the examination room with confidence, come out with satisfaction, and finally be surprised to see your score.

Hehe, this is the experience of a n people I collected, I hope it will help you!