We know that there is a score of 123 in mathematics for the postgraduate entrance examination. Although the content of the exam may be somewhat different, some reference books and review methods of Mathematics 123 are still worth learning. See how you got the math test in Grade Two 149.

When you plan to start the postgraduate entrance examination, what is the first question you have to face? As far as I know, engineering and learning materials are all tested on the second (whether master or master), while others, such as machinery, may be tested on the second in some schools. In this way, you will face a choice, whether to take one or two exams. From my personal point of view, the question of how much to take the exam ultimately depends on whether you pursue academics, so it seems to be a master's or a master's question.

In this case, I think, if you are pursuing academics, I just like this major. Then study for a master's degree. If you want to have a good school and platform, you can take a master's degree. Now let's talk about the review method of number two!

reference data

No.2 material: the whole book (required), Tang's lecture notes, Zhang Yu 18 lecture (whichever will do); Li Yongle's lecture notes on line generation counseling (if you have this book, you can tear off the line generation part behind the complete works of Li Er); True question (choose two plums); Problem set: 660 (required), the rest, such as Tang's 1800 and Zhang Yu's 1000, do it when you have time, and be your own weakness.

time management

Schedule on the 2nd: If you start early, I hope you can finish reading the lecture notes or teaching materials of Grade One before the summer vacation. It is still difficult to do exercises in textbooks. The summer vacation is over, and I hope I have completely read the whole book. Generally, August will be over soon. Then there are the second and third times, which depends on your own review progress and situation to analyze and how to arrange the time. If it's a real question, 10.20 or so is no problem.

Review method

My number two review method: I remember I started reviewing math in April. At first it was mainly textbooks. I spent more than a month on advanced mathematics textbooks. After class, I basically did it. I started to use soup handouts and watch soup videos. Basic textbooks and handouts are given at the same time. The textbook of linear algebra really took a whole month, but if you don't understand, watch the video first. It's basically June now, and I've also read Tang's lecture notes.

At this time, it is time to use the complete works of Li Er. For the use of The Complete Book of Li Er, you basically read it carefully, cover your answers with paper, and do one question after another. If not, just look at the answer and copy it again. In this way, after the high number part of the book, the rest is the online tutoring handout. The line generation passed me quickly, mainly because my textbooks were used for a long time in the early stage. After the lecture, I watched Li Yongle's video again for 2 days, and then I read the lecture carefully. Consolidate knowledge points.

The rest is to watch Zhang Yu's intensive video (the basic lesson video of soup used in the early stage). I still feel that I have gained a lot. In this way, it was basically completed for the first time, and it was already early August.

Then there are exercises. I used 660. Why do I recommend 660? This is mainly because there is a strong connection between 660 and The Complete Book of Erli, which is actually a good consolidation of my whole book and a good exercise of thinking. I have a high opinion of Li Er's book, mainly because the content of the book is comprehensive and the explanation of the concepts is in place. Pay great attention to the foundation, and the basic score of postgraduate entrance examination is about 120. The selected questions are very representative).

It took 1 week to do the high number part well, and then I used 1800 of the soup (if you can absorb about 80% of the soup lecture notes and videos in this book, it is not necessary to do it, but it seems unrealistic to most people, so it is still helpful for you to practice the weak parts). Of course, some people will choose to use Zhang Yu's 1000, which is actually similar.

So I started the second and third time, sorting out my notes. It was not until1October 20 10 appeared that I began to do real questions. It seems that doing real questions is one set a day, and I have little experience in real questions. But I recommend Li Er's real questions, mainly because I like the second half of line generation very much, which basically summarizes all the line generation questions including numbers one, two and three. I like them better, because the proposition group sometimes likes to change the questions, turning the question of number one into the question of number two.

The following simulation questions, I used Zhang Yu's last four sets of papers, and I feel that the questions are not bad. Average score of four sets 128. If, in the future, if you still have time, you can still use Zhang Yu's eight volumes, which is also quite good. Basically, mathematics is developed like this.

Puzzles and Solutions in Mathematics Review

1. Like to compare and see how others are progressing?

In fact, this is completely unnecessary. You can do it at your own pace, regardless of other people's situation. The key to mathematics is effectiveness, how well you learn and how to do the problem. This is the king.

2. When reviewing the complete works of Li Er, I reviewed some questions for three or four times, but I still didn't read them and didn't have any ideas.

Faced with such a problem, my answer is to give up this kind of problem and stop watching it, because when you watch it for the third time, 10 months will be there. There is not enough time. Read more questions that must be tested and questions that are sure to get points. This is the king.

3. When reviewing, it is difficult to prove the problem. All kinds of mean value theorems don't look like it. I really want to spend more time to solve it, but I feel that there is not enough time.

This kind of situation will happen to everyone, unless you are very talented in mathematics, you may not have this kind of problem. My solution is: I can tell you this even if I give you two months to do the proof questions every day. If I ask another question, you may not know it yet. So don't spend too much time, the requirement is: master Tang Jiafeng's skills. Given enough time, we can make a breakthrough.

I say this because if you get the proof of the mean value theorem, there must be two questions on the math test paper for postgraduate entrance examination. You will definitely ask the first question, and you may not ask the second question, but only a few people will get 6 points for the second question. In this case, your task is to carefully review the required test sites to ensure that you are right, and then you will get 144 points.

Finally, a suggestion for the study materials: you must learn better in the early stage of mathematics, otherwise, in the end, you will spend a lot of time memorizing political and professional courses, and the math time may be squeezed. This result may lead to poor math test, because it is very important to ensure the final math time, especially your computing ability.