The publishing house and the education department also indicated that they would accept the feedback from parents, conduct an investigation, and then make rectification.
Some time ago, I found that the teacher thought the illustrations were unreasonable and applied for replacement.
It can be seen that our people's teachers are actually more sensitive to students' affairs than parents.
There is still a gap between teachers' understanding of textbooks and parents'.
Parents can understand the problems of illustration, but not necessarily other problems. During this period, the teacher took this opportunity to reflect on the confusion of knowledge points in the textbook.
The class teacher pointed out the problems in the knowledge compilation of mathematics textbooks. If you want to talk about the education of students in the classroom, the front-line education teachers have the most say.
What kind of course editor is suitable for students and what kind of content can be said more efficiently. I have been a front-line teacher for many years and have my own standards.
This teacher is like this. The teacher is a math teacher in the first grade of primary school, and is responsible for the students' teachers.
Usually contact with classmates more, and learn more about classmates' preferences and achievements.
The teacher said that the arrangement of knowledge points in the textbook was unreasonable in the first grade.
When students are in grade one, they are unfamiliar with addition and subtraction. The first thing they learn is addition and subtraction within 20.
Then, you should study deeply. It is the addition and subtraction within 100.
However, there are two separate courses in the textbook, and there are some unrelated sorting and classification units in the middle textbook for students to learn.
The teacher said that such a curriculum arrangement is impossible without knowing the students' learning situation.
Moreover, the teacher said that not only the first grade, but also other grades.
The teacher said that the contents of the higher grades in the textbook, including decimals, scores and arrangement, were unreasonable.
These things that should have been systematically studied have separated the knowledge points.
Bohr has something to say. That's what the teacher said. What I want to express is that students' knowledge points are scattered.
It is easy to have the feeling of picking up watermelon, throwing sesame seeds and knocking on the hammer, and I can't learn clearly.
In this case, some experienced teachers will skip the knowledge points and ignore the textbooks.
Teachers find the most suitable teaching order for students according to their favorite rhythm.
But for new teachers, without such experience, they can only attend classes in the order written in textbooks.
If the students' knowledge points are really confused as the teacher said, it will be too late.
However, you can't just listen to one side of everything. There are many teachers, and each teacher teaches in a different way.
Do any teachers think this arrangement is reasonable? Actually, there is.
Some teachers think this arrangement is reasonable, and thousands of teachers think this arrangement is intentional.
Students who attend classes are just like adults who go to work. If they do fixed repetitive movements for a long time, they will be too tired to be interested.
The same is true of learning students' knowledge points. If you study the same knowledge point for several days in a row, you will be very tired and will also affect your learning efficiency.
We usually teach students to review methods. If they are tired of studying science, they can change their subjects and brains, which is also conducive to improving students' learning efficiency.
In addition, students learn related knowledge points every few knowledge points, which also plays a role in reviewing the old and learning new things.
This shows that there are thousands of people, different teachers and different students' teaching methods.
Finally. This time, because each teacher's speech is different, it is difficult for parents to distinguish. After all, there is no front-line teaching, and parents have no teacher's authority.
It is also recommended to parents who want to know which method is better.
Learn by yourself and the students and see which of the two ways is smarter.
However, as far as the author is concerned, although the author is not a front-line teacher, judging from other textbooks, there is no such thing.
So why is this version of mathematics the only teaching method? Is it because math is different? This should be given to the corresponding experts. After all, students' textbooks are not trivial matters, even if the knowledge points are arranged differently, they can't be indifferent.
Not all teachers can notice the problems and make adjustments according to their own experience. Many teachers have no such experience.
Such a teacher is a detailed textbook, and even if it feels wrong, it may be suspected that it is his own problem.
You can also organize seminars for senior teachers, and use the experience of front-line teachers for many years to judge the most suitable method for students to summarize knowledge points. In this case, the accuracy will be higher.
Today's topic: Do you think there is something wrong with this arrangement of teaching materials? Which statement do you support?
(The photos are all from the Internet. Infringement, please contact to delete)
If you have any questions about the self-taught/adult-taught examination, don't know the contents of the test sites for self-taught/adult-taught examination, and don't know the local policies for self-taught/adult-taught examination, click on Mr. official website at the bottom to get the review materials for free: /xl/