Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - What are the similarities and differences between the defensive and offensive principles used in chess and learning high school mathematics?
What are the similarities and differences between the defensive and offensive principles used in chess and learning high school mathematics?
Chess is different from other chess. Unlike gobang, gobang connects to win; It's not like Go has to lose the whole game and win many games. Even less like a military flag, it obeys superiors and subordinates. Chess only needs to win the head of the enemy commander, otherwise you will kill him completely, and your veteran will face it, and you will lose!

Gobang is equivalent to learning math by luck, but it's time to study hard for a while. But mathematics is scientific knowledge, and it is difficult to master it without some training. Even if you really do well in the exam, it's hard to find the reason for your wrong question. And I don't know why we have to compare, and I don't know why mistakes are more terrible!

Weiqi is equivalent to sea tactics. You can't wait to solve all the problems. However, according to the "learning efficiency theory" in psychology, it is not that the more times you study, the more you can master knowledge. But every time I finish a question, I have to check whether it is correct. If it is wrong, where is it wrong? If you make your exercise book full, you will not be in the mood to consider the usage of every knowledge point. But it is suitable for engineering, because engineering is practical ability, but the more the better, as long as you are sure that every step you do is right.

The military flag is equivalent to obeying the rules and doing what the teacher asks you to do. Some exercise books also divide the questions into ABC three difficulty levels. In fact, the foundation of mathematics should be solid, but you can't do it if you don't see it. Now teachers also divide students into three grades to solve ABC's problems, which is not only an insult, but also a constraint on students' development space. I suggest doing all kinds of difficult questions. Why can't a platoon leader capture the commander alive?

Only chess can be integrated into the style of special operations. It allows occasional cheating. Anyway, as long as you master the main points, it is enough for the 32 nd Army to take the general's head. But this is only for the college entrance examination ability!

Nor does it emphasize killing people and eating children, because even if you eat more, victory depends only on whether you do well in the exam. Exams don't give people a chance to explain, and reality doesn't give people this opportunity.

It also has no hierarchy, and a pawn can kill a general. Beginners can do problem a! When Xiaozhuang was a special soldier in Give Me the Last Bullet, wasn't he a private? As long as you can catch a mouse, who cares if it is a cat! As long as you do the right questions, who cares how you learn?

Also, remember to hold your veteran, that's your passing line. Once you lose your veteran, your chessboard is meaningless!

I think chess has something to do with high school mathematics, but that's all!

To tell the truth, playing chess requires chess virtue. No matter what kind of chess it is, don't always think about stealing a chess and touching a penny. Whether it is discovered or not, it is stealing, and it is possible to lose the qualification to play chess. Of course, if a game of chess is related to life, it must be carefully considered!