Languages other than composition: Yi. The difficulty of basic objective questions and classical Chinese is the same as last year or even decreased. The composition can't find the answer direction, so the difficulty of practical writing is reduced a little, and the difficulty of practical questions is increased a little (that's because 14 is too simple). The composition is too difficult to evaluate, and the accurate angle of examination is not easy to find.

Mathematics: Yi, if I remember correctly, the amount of calculation has dropped a lot compared with the requirements in recent years, and even the finale of multiple-choice questions is given points. However, the order of the last three questions was unexpectedly changed. Function is not an innovative question type in recent two years, and the calculation amount is much lower. Analytic geometry has nothing to say. I don't know if it's right. As the finale, the series is more difficult, but it is still within the operational range (much better than the disgusting function of last year's finale)

L 1: It's very simple. The questions and difficulty are similar to those in previous years. At first glance, it is understandable, and the vocabulary requirements are not as strict as the outline. But the objective questions don't know if there are hidden dangers and traps. The composition is also relatively calm, and the expression ability is not as high as the simulation volume in all parts of the province.

Richard: It's simple. Online comments are difficult to approach Chinese. Maybe they are talking about the national second volume, and I haven't done the whole volume, so it's not easy to compare. The difficulty of multiple-choice questions in three subjects in Guangdong is obvious, except for a chemistry question, which I think is a bit tricky. The elective big questions of the non-multiple-choice biology exam are a bit speechless, and the difficulty is still the same, but the personal review is not in place. Chemistry is said to be more difficult in more innovative, but I think it hasn't changed. The physics experiment problem becomes extremely simple from 14. I don't know what the questioner's mentality is. This big question focuses on carefulness, carefulness and carefulness, not problem-solving ability and thinking ability! I finally fell on question 36 .. I have repeated this reason many times just now. ..

Generally speaking, the 15 college entrance examination paper is still in Cantonese style, focusing on the foundation. In terms of overall difficulty, I think it is lower than 14, and the scores of each batch may be improved a lot (the difficulty distribution has already made me nervous)

The above may not be as rigorous and professional as the teacher, but after all, it is also a conclusion drawn by a fresh student's personal experience. I hope it will help you.