Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - Do the singularity in mathematics and the singularity in physics refer to the same thing?
Do the singularity in mathematics and the singularity in physics refer to the same thing?
Olbers's fallacy is that the expansion of the Singularity Big Bang produced the universe, supported by scientific evidence of explosive radio wave and ray residues, helium hydride and other substances, and the universe was produced by the brain blowing balloons like a dream. Imagine that before the explosion, the singularity had infinite mass, infinite volume, infinite temperature, no time, no space and no matter.

Infinite mass and infinitesimal volume are the origins of the universe. If the volume of the singularity is less than a quark, then conversely, the singularity is actually space, which is similar to space, but it is empty and cannot be zero-mass empty. Because there is a singularity with infinite mass, it cannot be called a singularity, but the whole universe. Or our universe is arranged by intelligence, and what is just in line with interests corresponds to our objectivity, materiality and reality. , reflecting the emergence of the universe, the universe is not necessarily produced by the big bang, but created under the isotropic conditions that are in line with the benefits.

About the origin of the universe, we usually hear the "Big Bang Theory", which is generally understood as a singularity with small volume, extremely high density and extremely high temperature, which has an unparalleled explosion and gradually evolved into the present universe in the subsequent expansion process.

The concept of singularity comes from mathematics, which means that mathematical expressions lose their meaning. For example, in f(x) = 1/x, "x = 0" is the singularity of this mathematical expression. So we can also understand the singularity in mathematics as a point that cannot be handled in mathematics. Similarly, the singularity in BIGBANG actually refers to the point that cannot be handled in physics.

People's long-term observation data of the universe show that the universe is in an accelerated expansion state. According to this phenomenon, scientists use the existing physical theory to track its time and try to find all the answers about the universe. So when did scientists trace the universe back to the present? The answer is 10-43 seconds after BIGBANG.

Modern observation shows that all the universes we can observe are scattering outward at a certain speed. Then scientists imagine that if there is the original video, if the video is reversed, then the present universe will shrink and accept it. If you receive it, you won't get the last point. Then say more. Isn't this a big attraction of quarks? It is a fact that the universe starts from a point and rises in all directions at a constant speed. But scientist, you can't keep turning this video upside down.

The starting point of the initial explosion is not a tiny point, because the universe is based on matter, and matter has volume. Your point exploded, and it is impossible to form so many existing substances in today's universe. I think the universe already exists, but there is still a starting point for the explosion. The starting point is the collision of two large black hole spheres, and the external force of the collision is transmitted to the interior of the spheres, which produces strong neutron changes at high temperature and high pressure, and the outward reaction force makes the two black hole spheres explode into pieces. The force splashing outward is greater than the gravity of the original sphere, and the black hole material with large mass density limit is released due to pressure, and the flying small debris instantly becomes larger. This is the galaxy that can be seen in the universe now.