Answer: There are many examples of poor math. The specific method is as follows:

First, laying a good foundation is the premise:

Foundation is the premise of improvement, and the purpose of laying a good foundation is to improve. Candidates should understand the dialectical relationship between foundation and improvement, arrange the review progress reasonably according to their own situation, and handle the relationship between laying the foundation and improving their ability. Generally speaking, foundation and improvement are staggered and segmented. At this stage, we should focus on the foundation, and then improve after the foundation is solid.

In this process, it is easy for candidates to encounter such a problem, that is, they feel that they have made little progress after a period of basic review or improvement, and even feel that the more they learn, the more they will regress. In this case, candidates should never be discouraged, but should firmly believe in their own abilities. As long as there is no problem with the review method, they should stick to it.

Although there seems to be no progress, the actual level has actually improved unconsciously, because this idea shows that candidates have realized their own shortcomings and are in the process of adjustment and progress. What is needed at this time is the willpower of the candidates. As long as you persist, there is hope of success.

Second, examples should not be ignored:

Candidates should do more examples when preparing for the exam, not just exercises. When doing examples, you should follow the following methods, that is, you must cover up the answers before reading them for the first time and do them yourself; Whether you do it or not, you should write down your thoughts in detail in the blank, especially when you can't. You must record your true way of thinking and leave it for later analysis, instead of getting the answer right and everything will be fine. This will soon find the feeling of doing the problem.

In short, candidates should develop the good habit of doing questions, be a serious and responsible person, carefully record the good or strange ideas and their own ideas in the answers they encounter, and usually look through them. Over time, their ability to solve problems will improve.

For those typical, flexible, inspiring and comprehensive questions, we should pay special attention to the cultivation of problem-solving ideas and skills. Mathematics test questions are ever-changing, but the knowledge structure is basically the same, and the question types are relatively fixed. There are often obvious problem-solving routines. After mastering it skillfully, it can not only improve the pertinence of solving problems, but also improve the speed and accuracy of solving problems.

Third, don't treat it as a problem-solving machine:

It is not worthwhile to improve math ability by doing problems blindly. Some candidates usually have high problem-solving ability, but their final exam results are not very satisfactory. When talking about the reasons for their failure, he said that he usually improved his level almost entirely by doing problems, but lacked a higher level of grasp and application of knowledge points, which led to a serious decline in the scoring rate when encountering unfamiliar problems.

Therefore, candidates can't do questions for the sake of doing them. They should lay a solid foundation and improve their grasp and application of knowledge points at a higher level. To be good at summing up, it is best to form a set of familiar problem-solving system for mathematical exercises, that is, to find corresponding problem-solving ideas for various types of questions, so as to take the initiative when facing unfamiliar questions in the final practice exam.

Note: Exactly! Hope to adopt!