1, Zhuge Liang's own words are the most convincing, and any exertion and imagination is a misinterpretation of the original intention. Zhuge Liang himself said that he "plowed Nanyang" and organized several articles, saying that many historical masters at that time verified that Zhuge Liang wrote "plowing Xiangyang" and later generations made a mistake; Or Zhuge Liang did something wrong when he was a "role model". "People are not sages, to err is human?" There are so many articles sorted out that no one can tell whether they are true or false. If you don't ask someone to carve a stone tablet to record Zhuge Liang's "experience" in Xiangyang at that time, and then dig it out after several years, please ask news organizations all over the country to publicize it with great fanfare, and then let the Institute of History of China Academy of Social Sciences produce a certificate (proving that this stone tablet was written by Jiang Wei himself), are you afraid that no one will believe it? Fake works are true and false.
2. Zhuge Liang claimed in "The Former Model": "In troubled times, you will die." Therefore, it must be proved that Xiangyang Longzhong, where Zhuge Liang was at that time, was not a peaceful place, but a troubled time, while Nanyang Wollongong was not a troubled time, but a place with developed economy and political stability. Zhuge Liang said in the former model: "I was clothed in cloth and devoted myself to Nanyang", and the latter model said: "Cao Cao was wise and resourceful, and used his troops like Sun Wu, but he was trapped in Nanyang, threatened Wuqiao, threatened Qilian, forced Liyang, lost several times to the North Mountain, almost died in Tongguan, and then faked. Two references to Nanyang not only show that Nanyang is in the midst of today's prosperity, but also find some reasons to show that Cao Cao is trapped in the middle of Xiangyang, which makes the word "Nanyang" consistent and mutually supportive.
3. In the early years, Zhuge Lu in Xiangyang was made of tiles, and later it was changed to * according to the appearance of Zhuge Lu in Wolonggang, Nanyang. I think it's a mistake to make a fool of yourself. I should quickly change Zhuge Road in Longzhong, Xiangyang to its original appearance. There is a saying called "Qin Zhuan Hanwa". Propaganda is that Zhuge Liang invented the tile in Xiangyang and built a tile house for himself "(* Lu should be a tile house, which is the first tile house in China. What a great idea! Scholars who hold the "Nanyang Theory" demand that "Longzhong Dui" be changed to "Lu Dui", which is really a lack of historical common sense, and the change should also be changed to "Varu Dui". (It is best to mobilize the authority of China's architectural history and archaeology to prove: "Experts found some tiles in Longzhong, Xiangyang, and the production date of these tiles is the same as Zhuge Liang's ploughing time in Longzhong! It is no different from Zhuge Liang's invention of tile, which is completely in line with historical records! )。 Many people who hold the "Nanyang theory" have no common sense of history and don't even know this? Those who "have no common sense of history" and hold the "Nanyang theory" are caught off guard.
4. In the "Sacrifice to the Prime Minister of Zhuge" written by Li Xing for Li Kasi, a general in the southern part of the Western Jin Dynasty, he said: "The son of heaven ordered me to keep my grandson for a long time, listen to the drums and think about the ages, and the legacy of the ancient philosophers, climb Longshan and overlook it, which is Zhuge's hometown. ...... yesterday, hidden, but this house, kind, can have an irregular outline. The sun lives in the moon. If it dies, you will have an inheritance. ..... Today I am thinking about this issue, and I am reviewing the past market. " This is the earliest record of Zhuge Liang's connection with place names, except that Zhuge Liang claimed that he was "cultivating Nanyang" in "The Teacher's List". Interpret this passage as: "Li Xing described neither the same thing nor the same place in the Beige Book." Therefore, it is concluded that "climbing Longshan overlooking and wiping Zhuge's hometown" does not happen in Nanyang, or even in Longzhong, Xiangyang, which gives people the feeling that it is unreasonable (exactly! )。 Find some linguists and historians to prove that in the Western Jin Dynasty, "Yang" meant the south of the water and "Mianyang" meant the south of the Hanshui River.
4. Separate Nanyang Wolonggang from Zhuge Liang in time. Let the Institute of History of China Academy of Social Sciences prove: "Before the Yuan Dynasty, there were no documents and historical materials about Zhuge Liang's seclusion in Nanyang today. After the Yuan Dynasty, the memorial building of Wuhou Temple appeared in Wollongong, Nanyang today. When we mention the word "Longzhong", we must bring the word "ancient" and call it "Gulongzhong". When the word "Wollongong" in Nanyang must be mentioned, it can be said to be "Wollongong in Nanyang City". Nanyang has been called a city for only a few years. The impression is that "Longzhong" in Xiangyang is much earlier than "Wollongong" in Nanyang? By the way, it is necessary to prove that Yue Fei was a person after the Yuan Dynasty as soon as possible, because when he wrote "model essay" in Wollongong, there must be Wollongong in Nanyang. At the same time, it is necessary to prove that Li Bai, who chanted "Who knows Wolongke, sings Long song and worries about the temple", and Liu Yuxi, who wrote "Zhuge Lu in Nanyang and Ting Yun Pavilion in Xishu", are all people after the Yuan Dynasty.
5. Yue Fei resisted gold, but he didn't get off to a good start. On his way back to Korea, he passed by Nanyang. In case of rain, I stayed at Nanyang Wuhou Temple for the night, and the Taoist priest of Nanyang Wuhou Temple asked for a word to commemorate it. Yue Fei moved back to the DPRK, thinking that Zhuge Liang had not made a good start, and he wrote Zhuge Liang's famous works "A Teacher's Example", "A Famous Composition" and "A Famous Official's Calligraphy", which became legendary stories. This article was published in Nanyang to commemorate Zhuge Liang all over the country. It is suggested that Xiangyang remove the postscript written by Yue Fei from the stele of Wuhou Temple in Xiangyang. Because it is clearly written in the postscript that it was made by Wuhou Temple in Nanyang, it is not good for "Xiangyang Theory". Furthermore, it is necessary to tackle the problems of Zhuge Liang memorial sites all over the country one by one, so that they can get rid of the postscript of the rubbings.
2 How does "On Xiangyang" fight for Zhuge Liang?
6. Highlight the favorable side of "Xiangyang Theory" and give people the impression that "Nanyang Theory" is a rootless tree and passive water. For example, the great historian Mr. Guo Moruo vigorously promoted the word "Zhuge * Lu" for Xiangyang Longzhong to prove that Xiangyang is Zhuge Liang's cultivated land. The world will forget that Mr. Lao Guo also wrote the words "Wuhou Temple" and "Zhuge * Lu" for Nanyang Wolonggang. Shooting the TV series Zhuge Liang can be said to be in the national Zhuge Liang memorial site, but don't mention Nanyang. In view of the fact that the network information has reached the point where it can't be ignored, if possible, organize a hacker team to delete or modify articles that are beneficial to the "Nanyang Theory" on the Internet. Give people the impression that Zhuge Liang has nothing to do with Nanyang. For those who hold the theory of Xiangyang, the best way to win Zhuge Liang is to prevent the theory of Nanyang from appearing, and never to prove the correctness of the theory of Xiangyang from historical theory and practice.
7. The highest authority of the country is the State Council. It is difficult to conquer the State Council, but it is not without shortcuts: it is best to write an article in the name of a famous domestic university professor and publish it in a national authoritative newspaper, claiming that the State Council has issued a document confirming Zhuge Liang's dedication to Xiangyang Longzhong. Readers, the State Council has admitted that Xiangyang is Zhuge Liang's cultivated land. What is the controversy about "Nanyang Theory" (the State Council won't care about this little thing! )? Remember: three makes a tiger, and telling a lie three times is like telling the truth. I have to say that the State Council downloaded three files, not just two.
8. Who is the historian and who can represent the historian? I'm afraid nobody cares. In this case, we must use "recognized by historians …" in our articles. In order to prove that the people who hold the "Xiangyang Theory" and their articles are universally recognized and correct in the history circle, this shows from a negative side that the articles holding the "Nanyang Theory" are just one opinion. When arguing with Nanyang people about Zhuge Liang, the simple academic discussion came too slowly. We should be a little arrogant and ignore the truth, no matter how many people in his country hold the "Nanyang Theory". Go up and say, "Except Nanyang, historians all agree that Xiangyang is Zhuge Liang's cultivated land." It doesn't matter which historiography field or what kind of historiography field. Only in this way, the nerd Nanyang side can only take a step back and argue that "national historians disagree." How many detours does a word game in Xiangyang make Nanyang take? I'm afraid Nanyang will also say, "Apart from Xiangyang, Nanyang is Zhuge Liang's cultivated land, which is recognized by historians", so please pay more attention. But even this can lead, at least it's a draw.
9. Because we are backward, China people are most afraid of being accused of ignorance. People who take pains to praise the "Nanyang Theory" in the debate are described as "lacking basic historical knowledge" (Yuan Zuliang, vice president of China Qin and Han History Research Association, professor, researcher and doctoral supervisor of the history department of Beijing Normal University, researcher Tao of Shanghai Museum, researcher Chen Shaodi of the Institute of History of China Academy of Social Sciences, editor-in-chief Shi of the historical research magazine Zhongzhou Today and Ancient, and editor of Historical Research of China Social Sciences have published it. It's just that this group is too big, and many people are famous and talented, so we must think about countermeasures before we act. ); Those who hold the "Xiangyang theory" are said to be "masters who respect history." Let's see if anyone dares to speak for the "Nanyang Theory". Don't think that the so-called "teachers", "experts" and "professors" are all knowledgeable guardians of truth. A contemporary "gene queen" puzzles domestic experts, scholars and news media? What's more, this Millennium saliva "lawsuit"?
10, as the ancients said, "If you want to learn poetry, you need kung fu outside it". In my opinion, academic disputes must be solved by means other than academics. In order to show the magnanimity of those who hold the "Xiangyang Theory" and avoid others scolding the trend of learning hegemony, it is best to say this in the tone of Xiangfan people after emphasizing that Wollongong in Nanyang is not the original work: "Zhuge Liang's so-called" Wollongong "in Nanyang is a theory attached by later generations, not a historical fact. However, if historical research is treated differently from the protection of cultural sites (although there are incidental components) and the development of tourism, it is no harm to keep Nanyang Wollongong as a tourist attraction. " After reading this passage, others will first think that Nanyang Wollongong is just a place attached to future generations, but those of us who hold the "Xiangyang theory" have so generously agreed to take Nanyang Wollongong as a tourism development. This move should be one step ahead to prevent Nanyang from using it to deal with the "Xiangyang Theory".
1 1, Institute of History, China Academy of Social Sciences, tackled the problem, and let them prove that "Zhuge Liang's seclusion place recorded in historical documents of past dynasties was consistent in Xiangyang Longzhong". It gives people the impression that the "Nanyang Theory" was formed only in recent years. Is groundless. In this way, we may face such a problem: there are so many documents in history that record Zhuge Liang's practice in Wollongong, Nanyang. What should we do? No matter how hard we try to solve this problem, it is impossible for the ancients to modify the existing literature! However, it is not helpless. It is suggested to go to all parts of the country to find out and buy these documents supporting the "Nanyang Theory" one by one, and burn the original text. This is really "the historical documents of past dynasties record that Zhuge Liang has always lived in Xiangyang Longzhong".
3 How does "On Xiangyang" fight for Zhuge Liang?
12, "Thieves Shout to Catch Thieves": Don't think that thieves shouting to catch thieves is a derogatory term, it is a very useful means of struggle. On the one hand, organize manpower, financial resources and material resources to concoct articles beneficial to the theory of Xiangyang, on the other hand, declare that Zhuge Liang's dedication to Xiangyang Longzhong is an indisputable historical fact, and it is useless to argue again, blocking the mouth of the theory of Nanyang; On the one hand, it denounces the articles that hold "Nanyang theory" for turning a blind eye to the evidence that is beneficial to "Xiangyang theory", on the other hand, it turns a blind eye to the articles that are beneficial to "Nanyang theory" when writing articles; On the one hand, it quotes articles in Xiangyang Historical Records that are beneficial to "Xiangyang Theory", on the other hand, it reprimands those who hold "Nanyang Theory" for quoting some unreliable Nanyang Historical Records. Academic debate is the same as war: virtual reality is real.
13, tell me about yourself. Just don't worry about the truth, just say your own words. It is better to have evidence, even if there is no evidence, it is "unwarranted". Don't be afraid even if there is no "unwarranted" evidence. Make bold assumptions without proof. Publishing an article first will have a certain impact. For example, it is declared that "Nanyang Wuhou Temple was built in Yuan Dynasty, much later than Xiangyang Longzhong". As for the real age of Wuhou Temple in Nanyang, let readers guess. Claiming that "Zhuge Liang did his best and died" is an unquestionable problem in the history circles at home and abroad. All the works of the Three Kingdoms believe that Zhuge Liang's seclusion is in the middle of Xiangyang City, ten kilometers west of the city. No matter who can represent the historians at home and abroad, no matter how many works of the Three Kingdoms think that Zhuge Liang's seclusion is in Nanyang. "You know, there are not many people who have really discussed Zhuge Liang's hard work. If you are selfish, you can at least make people feel that you are, so that the debater's purpose is achieved.
14, a method that will never work: public relations. No matter how big a historian is, he has to obey the orders of public relations personnel! Please don't blame our historians too much for this. They are people. Nanyang said that the authoritative map Atlas of Chinese History was under the jurisdiction of "Nanjun" where Xiangyang was in Longzhong, so you went to the editor-in-chief of Atlas of Chinese History to tackle the problem and let him declare that Atlas of Chinese History was wrong at that time. Let the Institute of History of the Chinese Academy of Sciences give them a certificate saying, "Zhuge Liang worked hard in Longzhong, Xiangyang, but never in Wollongong, Nanyang." I don't think the Institute of History of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences will take the initiative to find proof for Xiangyang for no reason, but I'm afraid I will get it. Remember that the certificate must be stamped with the official seal of the Institute of History of China Academy of Social Sciences. This method of showing the mysteries of history has never been seen before. Kung fu is used, and even the "literati" who compile middle school textbooks can't handle it! The "literati" captured by the "Xiangyang theory" will find a grand reason for their own self-interest. Don't be afraid of others saying that we engage in academic malpractices. There are many unhealthy tendencies in society. "Go your own way and let others talk!"
15. Compared with Longzhong, Xiangyang, there are many inscriptions in Wolonggang, Nanyang, which record the nostalgia of literati and dignitaries for Zhuge Liang for thousands of years. No matter how much money Xiangyang people spend, they can't ask the ancients to write a composition to set up a monument, but they can collect articles that record Zhuge Liang's dedication to Xiangyang theory in previous dynasties and make a number of stone tablets (note: traditional Chinese characters must be used, and the date of setting up a monument must not be recorded, giving people the impression that these stone tablets are set up by predecessors. )
16, The Encyclopedia of China explains Nanyang as: "It is the hometown of Zhang Heng, Zhang Zhongjing, Bai Xixi, Zhang Xun and other famous Qin ministers. There are medical shrines built in memory of Zhang Zhongjing, Zhuge Lu built in memory of Zhuge Liang in Nanyang, Wuhou Temple, Wancheng Site, Bailixi Tomb, Wangshan Mountain, Dacheng Hall, etc. " Xiangfan's explanation is that "the scenic spots and historical sites include guangde temple Pagoda, Gudengcheng Site, Cheng 'en Temple, Shuijingzhuang, Chu Imperial City Site, Zenghouyi Tomb, Dahongshan Scenic Area and so on. "Xiangyang seems to have not carried out research activities on relevant editors. If it is to be carried out immediately, it must be added to Xiangfan's explanation that "Xiangyang is twenty miles west, and there is Zhuge Liang's cultivated land in Longzhong." Ask them to remove Nanyang's explanation: "Zhuge Liang commemorates Zhuge Liang in Nanyang, as well as Wuhou Temple". The influence of Encyclopedia of China is worldwide!
17. In short, whether a person is good for Nanyang or Xiangyang depends on how you use it. In order to emphasize the justice of tooth digging, it can be said that tooth digging is far from home; In order to emphasize the familiarity with Xiangyang and the credibility of the articles, it is said that Xiangyang people have lived in Xiangyang for a long time. In order to illustrate the credibility of the professor, it needs to be emphasized that "Xiangyang Theory" has been recognized by Professor Tan Qixiang. In order to illustrate the credibility of unofficial history, it needs to be emphasized that "Hanshu Jinshu Chunqiu" is a work on teeth, which is unofficial history, but it is quite fair and credible than the official history. Official history is more reliable if it is conducive to making Zhuge Liang, and unofficial history is conducive to making Zhuge Liang's statement that unofficial history is not necessarily unreliable. In short, it is more important to emphasize which side is beneficial to Zhuge Liang.
4 How does "On Xiangyang" fight for Zhuge Liang?
18, Zhuge Liang's first battle was to burn Wang Bo (Wang Bo is dozens of kilometers northeast of Wancheng, further away from Xiangyang). If Zhuge Liang closed the mountain in Longzhong, Xiangyang, hundreds of miles away, he knew all about places hundreds of miles away from himself and fought like a god (there was no reconnaissance plane or anything at that time), I'm afraid people wouldn't believe him. It is better to find a historian to prove that this Wang Bo is not Wang Bo, and Wang Bo burned by Zhuge Liang is near Xiangyang (it is best to find a place in the southwest of Xiangyang, as far away from Nanyang as possible! ), rather than Wang Bo in the northeast.
19, Nanyang Wuhou Temple is a national key cultural relics protection unit. The title of National Key Cultural Relics Protection Unit of Nanyang Wuhou Temple should be cancelled jointly with relevant departments of the State Council. Fortress is the easiest to break from the content. If possible, pretend to work and send a person with "Xiangyang theory" to Nanyang as the mayor, so that the literati with Zhuge Liang's "Nanyang theory" can be suppressed in Nanyang; Dismantle the Wuhou Temple in Nanyang, or just let Nanyang newspaper publish articles about Xiangyang, not articles about Nanyang. At least send someone into Nanyang Zhuge Liang Research Association to learn about each other's relevant information.
20. Further deify Zhuge Liang. God, and only God, can grow into an outstanding strategist and politician in the closed ravine in Longzhong. Didn't you see this "master" who looks like a fairy? What "real people" are all high-ranking people hiding in the mountains! Nanyang at that time was a place where political struggle was fierce and military competition was constant. It's the standard world of mortals in troubled times, and it doesn't look like a place where immortals appear.
2 1. Negotiate with Nanyang to stop the argument. There are many famous people in Nanyang: Shang Sheng Fan Li, Medical Sheng Zhang Zhongjing, Neo-Confucianism Sheng Zhang Heng, Han Guangwu Emperor Liu Xiu, One of the Twenty-eight Lodging Houses, and Three Kingdoms (Huang Zhong, Deng Ai, Wei Yan,). ), Han Yu, Eight Masters in Tang and Song Dynasties, and Master of Philosophy Feng Youlan.
22. Hanshui River is diverted. Both ancient and modern data show the dividing line between Nanjun and Nanyang County during the Three Kingdoms period of Hanshui (Wanli's "Xiangyang Fuzhi": "West of Wanshan, north of Hanshui, under the jurisdiction of Deng County of Nanyang." In any case, the contemporary people who hold the "Xiangyang theory" and those who have been captured by the contemporary people who hold the "Xiangyang theory" all recognize this in their hearts. It is unreasonable to "delimit" Longzhong, a tiny place just a dozen kilometers away from Xiangyang City (belonging to Nanjun County) and south of Hanshui River, which belongs to Nanyang County and is more than 0/20 kilometers away from the north of Hanshui River. It is suggested that Xiangyang divert the Hanshui River and let it flow from the middle and south of Longzhong. Xiangyang Shuo lacks an insurmountable mixing stone; Is there a piece of evidence missing from the "Nanyang Theory"? Or move the existing "Longzhong Dui" to a place south of Hanshui River for reconstruction to compete with Nanyang.
23, held "Nanyang said" experts and scholars to tackle key problems. It is also impossible to convince national historians and all people who hold the "Nanyang theory" to give up the "Nanyang theory" and pour the financial resources of Xiangfan. However, we can tackle the key problems of the "Nanyang Theory" and make them turn their guns, at least stop expressing opinions that are beneficial to the "Nanyang Theory". Although "tackling key problems" may not be effective for everyone, it always has some effect.
I also know that Xiangyang has basically used most of the above tricks. But everything is fair in war. Wouldn't it be nice to sum up these tricks today and raise them to the theoretical level, which in turn will guide practice? The used methods should be kept, and the unused tricks should be realized as soon as possible.