In April, 20021year, Law School of Renmin University of China announced the results of postgraduate entrance examination. There are more than 30 candidates. Because they leaked the retest questions in the WeChat group, the retest score was recorded as 0. Once the news was fermented on social platforms, it caused widespread concern and discussion among netizens.

Some netizens believe that it is natural for these candidates to make such deviant behavior and get such punishment when they have signed a promise of good faith in the second interview; There are also some netizens who pay attention to the behavior of journalists and think that this behavior of journalists is a kind of? Unfair behavior? It will ruin others' efforts for a year or years. The author believes that if a violation is recognized as reasonable by society or most people, what is it? Violation? This nature has not actually changed. Therefore, the author is actually in favor of the reporter's behavior.

First, legal persons should have a sense of rules.

First of all, the Law School of Renmin University of China is the highest hall of law in China. Candidates who apply for schools should have a sense of rules. As a future legal person, you should know what you can do and what you can't do. Therefore, it is in line with the regulations for informants to report these deviant behaviors to the school, and it is also the rule consciousness that legal persons should have.

Second, the reason cannot be greater than the regulations.

Some netizens condemned the whistleblower's behavior, because they thought that more than 30 candidates could enter the Law School of Renmin University of China for a second interview, which was enough to prove their Excellence and their efforts. The whistleblower's report will liquidate their efforts to zero, so they think that the whistleblower's behavior is immoral, but in fact, the reason cannot be greater than laws and regulations. If there were no rules, there would be no Fiona Fang. When any rule becomes insurmountable. Gap? Then the existence of rules is unnecessary.

Third, the reporter's move is also a wake-up call for the latecomers.

In fact, in the process of postgraduate entrance examination, compared with the initial examination, the importance and formality of re-examination have declined in everyone's mind, but after the reporter's move, it will also be conducive to the further standardization of re-examination in various institutions in the future.