First of all, it depends on whether the training company has its own full-time lecturer. Most excellent training companies have their own lecturers. As we all know, the cost of training lecturers is very high. Since the training company keeps its own lecturers, it definitely wants to develop for a long time, rather than using training as a tool to make money in the short term. Such a training company will also constantly temper the lecturer's courses, rather than relying on the lecturer to ponder. Therefore, if you choose such a training company to cooperate, the risk of the course will be less and the quality of the course will be guaranteed to some extent. They regard their lecturers as the symbol of marketing, so they dare not mess around in the market. These training companies are the first choice for enterprises, and enterprises depend on whether they have their own lecturers.

The second is to see whether the training company is a mature foreign course. In European and American countries, training has become a "routine action" in enterprise management, and many courses have formed a system and are relatively standardized. Compared with domestic suppliers of similar courses, their quality is relatively better. For management courses, you can rest assured to cooperate with such companies, because management is interlinked in many aspects. As for marketing courses, you should be careful, because marketing is very different. If the courses of agents are not localized, they will definitely be divorced from the reality of the China market. But in any case, training managers choose these companies to cooperate and buy such courses, which is still guaranteed. Even if something goes wrong, there are enough "reasons" to explain it. You can tell students: "Even the courses of a company are not to our taste. It seems that there are really no suitable courses on the market. Or develop it yourself. " This kind of training company is the second choice for enterprises, depending on whether the training company is an excellent course for agents.

If the enterprise finds a training company that "raises lecturers" and a training company that acts as an agent for foreign courses, and there is no suitable course, it is necessary to find an intermediary training company. Choosing this kind of training company is risky. There are also 369 training intermediary companies. Excellent intermediary companies have long-term cooperation agreements with lecturers, and both sides guarantee the quantity and quality of courses, and the cooperation is also very close. Training companies will not mess around for their own reputation in the market, and lecturers will not mess around for their own image. Lecturer's courses have also been carefully audited by such training companies, and the quality can be guaranteed to a certain extent. Therefore, such a company is the third choice for enterprises, which depends on whether there is long-term cooperation.

If the above three training companies do not have suitable courses, they can only find pure training institutions. This kind of training company has a lot of courses, and basically has no business focus. It just takes the outline of the lecturer and makes a lucky deal. They don't know much about the course content and training needs, and their internal staff are relatively mobile, so they often go out to "start a business". For the lecturers they provide, enterprises should strictly inspect them, not only by the background and reputation of the training company, but also by the background and strength of the lecturers. The enterprise can call the company that the lecturer has taught to investigate and see how his teaching effect is. Or bring the lecturer's evaluation form of previous classes to see what the students think of him. Or investigate the lecturer's reputation in the training market with the training company that he works closely with. You can also search online to see if he has any articles and books. Such a training company is the fourth choice for enterprises and must be strictly examined. Enterprises should look at the real strength of lecturers.