Figure 1 Baidu account "Xishan Ju" historical answer screenshot?
In figure 1, only twice after Baidu registered its account "Xishanju" did Baidu know the answer of the website (figure 1 is marked with a red five-pointed star in the upper right corner), which is a negative evaluation of Epro research. And the interval between the two answers is less than half an hour. These two comments were not answered before, and the screenshot was closed after these two comments (2017 65438+122:00 on October 23rd).
Figure 2 Screenshot of Baidu account "thy_09" historical answer?
Figure 2: After registering Baidu account "thy_09", the website's answer is only known three times in Baidu (as shown by the red five-pointed star in the upper right corner of Figure 2), and two of them are negative comments on Yi Baoyan. These three comments were not answered before, and then the screenshot was closed (1 20 1765438+22:00 on October 23rd). More coincidentally, the writing time of the first negative comment in Figure 2 was 2065438+August 6th, 2007 +04: 47, while Figure/kloc-0. The second negative comment in Figure 2 was written on August 6th, 2007 at 20 15: 12, and the second negative comment in Figure 1 was also written on August 6th, 2007 at 20 15: 12. Two different accounts give similar answers to the same question, and the time of answering is highly consistent. It can be speculated to a large extent that these two accounts are actually owned by 1 person, and this person may control more accounts. If you are a normal netizen, you usually only have one account (especially at the same time and in the same minute). Why use multiple accounts to give similar answers to the same question? In addition, the third answer of "thy_09" account can be seen in Figure 2, which is a positive answer to others.