AMI is one of the widely used systems in the world. Coupled with its background and training quality, it is almost regarded as the "root seedling red" in the field of Montessori teacher training. And the gold content of its certificate, to be honest, I think it is more reflected in its control over the quality of teacher training.

Six months' practical training+more than ten short essays writing+the production of a large workbook+three months' observation practice+the final exam with only one chance to retake the exam at the end of the term, which ensures the training quality of AMI.

If such training will bring you anything, it is a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the essence of Montessori thought+the operation and principle of teaching AIDS+the formation of the most basic Montessori class management concept. It is no exaggeration to say that every Ami teacher has at least the professional ability to be a head teacher (of course, there will always be cases), and many Ami teachers have built small classes as principals as soon as they come out.

AMS explained:

As for AMS, I have never personally participated in it, but discussed it from my friends and some personal experiences. In fact, its strength lies not in training, but in similar business integration consulting, garden service and parent promotion. In short, it is a marketing route for large-scale promotion.

Therefore, its popularization scope and speed are faster and wider than AMI. AMS first entered the domestic Montessori teaching market, which is why it is more famous than AMI in China. In all fairness, AMS and its institutions have contributed to the development of Montessori teaching in China.