The thinking of answering questions in training textbooks is the basic law to solve general problems and a kind of thinking. Remember this kind of thinking, not specific sentences, and rearrange it in your own language to form a personalized and exclusive answering thinking.
For example, comprehensive analysis of test questions is generally the idea of finding problems first, then analyzing them and finally solving them, which is the only process to solve any social problems. This is what every candidate must master. However, in the process of specific application, you will find that you can't find ideal and efficient measures for some problems, so you can change the proportion of the answers, pay great attention to the analysis of the impact of the problems, and simply put forward some suggestions to solve the problems. Don't give up on yourself because you can't find suitable measures.
The idea of answering questions is to be mastered, but the content of answering questions needs to be flexibly displayed. For example, in interpersonal relationship test questions, it is often analyzed that the reason is "misunderstanding", but what misunderstanding will occur in combination with the topic? This is where you need to go deep, instead of simply applying a template and saying, "My colleagues may have misunderstandings about me, so I should actively communicate and solve them." This is similar to not saying anything. There are many misunderstandings. For example, you can say, "Maybe it's because I'm too focused on the progress of my work and neglected the communication with my colleagues, making him think that I'm a person who goes my own way. In fact, I am a very friendly person and I want to prove it to him. "
Outstanding characteristics of the template:
First, recite the same answer stiffly. For example, the beginning and the end are the same, the intermediate processing process is not combined with the topic, and the language is basically the same.
Second, the answer is empty, not closely combined with the topic, not targeted and not lively.
For example, for interpersonal problems, some of the same patterned language is "I believe my colleagues are honest, honest, and the leaders are highly conscious ...", so we should use the thinking of answering questions flexibly. For example, this patterned language is to show our trust in colleagues and leaders, and trust in organizations and collectives. This kind of thinking can also be used, but it should be changed to our own language. For example, believing is always more difficult than believing. As a young man, I should be proactive. Communication is the key to untie the knot, and it is also a good medicine to resolve misunderstandings. In addition, since we have come to this team, we should trust our teammates and leaders. There are no perfect individuals, only perfect teams. Even if my colleagues do have imperfections, I will tolerate them. The so-called seeking common ground while reserving differences is the way to get along.
Thirdly, template-based answers sometimes apply mechanically, such as some questions that comprehensively examine interpersonal relationships, emergency response ability and organizational ability, and simply reach the answer structure of a single question type. Some candidates even make mistakes in analyzing problems, and reach the problem of interpersonal relationship with the problem of phenomenon view and so on. All of them are suicide answers that completely ignore the question when they are in high emotional tension.