Legal analysis: 1. Although the ban was issued by the Ministry of Education, relevant experts interpreted it. This ban belongs to the category of rules and regulations. It is normal for the education department to deal with teachers who violate the rules. But the ban is not a law, nor can it be used as a law to deal with teachers.

2. It is illegal to find remedial facilities in residential buildings! Don't say you didn't find it. Even if there are related facilities, no students make up classes, or students make up classes, it is impossible to confirm whether they are paid or not, and it cannot be considered illegal. Check whether it is illegal by illegal means. This method is illegal first!

3. I have repeatedly stated my position: As long as in-service teachers don't send students to training classes, they don't serve as make-up teachers in make-up classes, and only make up lessons for one or two children. Because of personal relationships, this is not called make-up classes. This is a person! But also labor, the reward is valuable, but friendship is priceless. As for the high cost of making up lessons, all in-service teachers don't have to carry this pot, and there is no need to carry it.

Legal basis: Article 25 of the Compulsory Education Law of People's Republic of China (PRC). Schools shall not charge fees in violation of state regulations, and shall not seek benefits by selling goods and services to students or in disguised form.