At present, the market is full of so-called IT training institutions, many of which advocate that there is no bottom line for training for several months and how much the monthly salary is, attracting a large number of small white people to flood into training institutions. The starting point of some training institutions is just how to gather funds quickly, and the so-called people who come to learn IT are more likely to enter the institutions because they are advocated by these institutions to have money and good jobs. The actual learning process only focuses on how to deal with the interview, and does not put the skills into the field.
This practice has caused some formal training institutions to become synonymous with unreliable under the impact of these informal training institutions. Just as we divide people by region, northerners are bound to squat, while southerners are small and elegant, where there is such absolute.
Xiao Bai, who submitted a large number of resumes, such as interviews, wasted a lot of resources of the recruitment company and was finally killed by a stick. In the process of resume screening, I was sent away directly.
On the other hand, the starting point of training personnel in institutions is often how to find a job quickly and put forward salary requirements that do not match their abilities. Moreover, the foundation is not firm, there is no learning mentality, or just for job hopping, which leads to the work not meeting the company's requirements, or the brain drain is too serious. In this case, people from training institutions continue to be labeled as unreliable.
What's more, programmers eat technical food. The difference between rookie Xiaobai and Great God is too great, and the work efficiency and results are incomparable. This is why sometimes, companies would rather pay double the salary to recruit experienced programmers than train programmers from institutions.