I don't think it's smart to kill with a stick. First of all, most schools are now enterprise models, treating students as workers, not students. Once many violations are reported by students, they will be leaked immediately and even threatened by the school. The food is not clean, and there are frequent incidents in school bullying. Students go to school not to serve some people, but to learn knowledge that can survive in society in the future. What kind of private school is this? If everything goes according to the rules, it will become a hierarchical world. Why not send the children to a special teacher to teach themselves? I'm really opposed to those educational institutions that speak for profit. But I can't accept it if it destroys private education. Looking back now, if you aim at the self-study exam from the beginning, you can save at least two years. It seems that compulsory education is quite good. Yes, if something goes wrong, you have to put up with it, either the teacher or the school. If you can't stand it, you will be expelled from school, and you will have nothing. If you want to go to school again, no one will accept it. Of course he can take the self-study exam, but how many children can withstand such a blow? Let a child bear these things that need to be considered after entering the society. .......

Please think about it, how much knowledge have you learned in primary school, junior high school and senior high school? How much do you remember now? How much is related to your current position and how much can be used in your life. It is said that people are ignorant of law every day. If the law is really popularized, is it more appropriate to change the political course into a law course? What's wrong with putting the irrelevant basic knowledge of geography, biology, physics and chemistry into universities for further study? Ordinary people only need to learn basic knowledge, which is nothing more than adjusting the study period of middle schools and universities.