(1) The cultural quality of officers and men on duty at the grass-roots level is not high. At present, the officers and men of grass-roots fire fighting units are mostly high school and junior high school students. However, the knowledge of chemistry, physics and electronic information required by fire fighting forces to participate in training and fighting is not applicable to most of our officers and men, and it is impossible to establish good information communication during training. Moreover, although instructors try their best to achieve ideal training results, it is difficult to get results quickly even through training. Due to the limitations of these basic qualities, we can't thoroughly understand and master the training content, which directly affects the quality and progress of technical training. It can be directly said that the contradiction between a large number of sophisticated equipment, increasingly complex accident handling requirements and low scientific and cultural quality of officers and men has become a bottleneck restricting the level of training and actual combat. How to solve this contradiction is the key to improve the training effectiveness of fire forces.

(2) Lack of professional and technical personnel. Fire forces are the main professional forces to deal with all kinds of disasters and accidents, which requires that China's fire forces need a large number of professional fire fighting and rescue technicians to support a large number of professional rescue sites. But the reality is that to cultivate a good professional and technical personnel, long-term systematic training is needed. Due to military service and other reasons, there is a serious shortage of professional and technical personnel with experience and high practical ability. Many units do not have senior engineers in fire fighting and rescue, nor do they have technicians in large grass-roots fire fighting units, and there are not many experienced fire fighting commanders and combatants. The lack of professionals directly affects the intensity of technical training. In practice, in the face of all kinds of complicated operations and high-tech equipment, it is often impossible to carry out systematic training, and it is difficult to get professional guidance and advice if the training quality reaches the standard according to the equipment operation specifications. The training is often a mere formality, informal and difficult to achieve results.

(3) The training is single and the actual combat is not strong. At present, all kinds of technical training carried out by grass-roots fire fighting forces, from various exercises to the use of specific equipment, have been obtained through many practical tests and the practical experience of many predecessors. With little experience in actual combat, it is difficult for some fire brigades to encounter major fire accidents, some of which happened a long time ago. Therefore, most officers and men have not experienced large-scale fire accidents. Commanders only take some simple procedures of equipment technology and operation training, and don't know the actual application effect of equipment in actual combat, so it is difficult to carry out technical training in depth. Moreover, the commander's technical training, especially the rich experience in technical practice, is seriously lacking. It is impossible to realize that drill is an effective means to make up for the lack of actual combat experience and the best carrier to apply technical training to actual combat. When conducting fire fighting and rescue drills, it is a formality, a formality.