The * * * reading plan of the fourth issue of Master Yu Hongmei Studio is to read how China teachers do scientific research. It was originally planned to start reading at the beginning of this month, but unfortunately the books were not in place. Thank you, Mr. Cheng, for using the weekend time to buy books and help me with my shopping. The long-awaited book finally came out this afternoon, so I quickly flipped through it. The dispute over the practical strategy of choosing a research topic is a topic, a task is a topic, and contradiction is a topic ... the basic way of Chinese teaching and scientific research.

In the preface, I was deeply moved by a sentence: "What the teacher did by experience, in fact, he didn't think clearly. I couldn't say it because I didn't think it clearly. Because he can't say it, and he can't reflect. What he did in the back was to stand still. The so-called platform period was formed in this way. " I dare not say the platform period now, but it is definitely a platform period. "It is better to make a strategy in a hurry than make a hundred decisions." I thought this strategy must be writing. I have gained long-distance expected gains through writing, but my long-term output is not only perseverance, but also accumulation. All the accumulated things have been used up. Insisting on writing is just touching myself, but I don't want to stop there. Many times. At this time, the book karma appeared in front of me, which is really a treasure!

The first chapter selects practical strategies for the research topic. The first method is to start with hot issues and controversial issues. I remember an online training. I once asked Professor Niu, the lecturer at that time, whether to choose hot spots or regular spots for writing papers. Now that I think about it, I should ask how to cut into hot topics. An example is written in the book, and whether the debate about Lu Xun's literature and sweating in 1989 has completely become the focus of debate. Around several elements of argumentative writing, the two sides hold their own ends, saying that the public is fair and reasonable, and the old woman says that the old woman is reasonable. Starting from the characteristics of the text, the author Li Hailin participated in the discussion with "Don't forget the characteristics of Lu Xun's essays". "The argument is not sufficient, and this argument is not a standard at all. As a paper, it doesn't need sufficient argumentation at all ". This reminds me that in the daily teaching process, there are many times when I will encounter this kind of argument. It makes sense to look at the speech of this school. Listen to what that school thinks. That makes sense. I don't know what to do. On second thought, social studies may just not be so clear about right and wrong, so be it! In fact, I gave up further thinking, didn't "find a blind spot", didn't think about the necessity of this problem, and the topic that could have been generated was lost in vain.

In the future teaching process, I should always pay attention to the cutting-in angle of hot issues, find blind spots and think more about how to put pen to paper.