The Ministry of Education has ordered a vigorous rectification of off-campus training institutions. Many parents are looking forward to banning off-campus training institutions, but it is impossible to ban off-campus training institutions Even if it is rectified, it will only make off-campus training institutions more standardized and transparent in management and fees, and will not affect the development of the education and training industry. There is a market only when there is demand. In response to the order of the Ministry of Education, Beijing fired the first shot of off-campus training institutions, setting an example for the whole country to rectify off-campus training institutions. If there is no accident, the number of roads in the country should be similar, which may not be as strong as that in Beijing.

After-school services are fully covered, junior high school students can study at night, and schools use weekends to carry out weekend service activities; It is forbidden to train children under the age of 6, including language training, to conduct online education and training for children under the age of 6, to no longer approve the establishment of off-campus and off-campus discipline education and training institutions for primary and secondary school students, and to prohibit educational enterprises from placing advertisements in official media ... Recently this weekend, the heads of off-campus education and training institutions were surrounded by all kinds of rumors of severely rectifying off-campus education and training institutions. According to the network news, some areas in China will carry out the pilot work of "double burden reduction" to reduce the workload of students in compulsory education and the burden of off-campus training.

In this regard, the relevant person in charge of the Ministry of Education said that it is normal to standardize off-campus training and reduce students' excessive extracurricular burden. The policies issued by the state and local governments shall be based on the contents published through official channels, so as to prevent misinformation from forming inaccurate information. Will these measures be implemented? Can it play a "double reduction" role in reducing students' homework burden and off-campus training burden after implementation? We might as well analyze the possibility of implementing measures in these rumors from the reaction of public opinion to these measures.

Judging from the market's reaction to the rumored measures, it really hit the seven inches of off-campus education and training institutions. Training institutions are most worried about two things. First, schools keep students on campus, and school education meets the needs of most parents, thus reducing the demand for off-campus education and training institutions. The beauty of "reducing the burden on campus and increasing the burden off campus" in the past is gone forever. Second, explicitly say no to higher education that violates the education law, and completely ban subject training and online training for teenagers. From the point of view of satisfying the differentiated choice of the educated, it is unrealistic and unreasonable to prohibit the subject training in compulsory education, but the teacher's suspension of the subject training and online training for children under 6 years old is nominal and completely violates the educational law. This is against children receiving higher education.