1. formalization of innovation: some grassroots governance innovations often only focus on formal innovation and ignore actual effects. Innovation for the pursuit of innovation leads to the disconnection between form and content, which cannot really solve practical problems.

2. Lack of scientific planning: Some grassroots governance innovations lack scientific planning and do not fully consider the actual situation and long-term development. As a result, it is difficult for innovative projects to continue to advance, or even repeat waste.

3. Lack of talent support: grassroots governance innovation needs talent support with certain professional knowledge and skills. However, some grass-roots units lack the corresponding talent reserve and training mechanism, and it is difficult to effectively implement innovative projects.

4. Imperfect assessment and evaluation mechanism: The assessment and evaluation mechanism of grassroots governance innovation is often imperfect, and the actual situation and long-term development are not fully considered. Therefore, some innovative projects are just formal innovations in response to evaluation and evaluation.