Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Education and training - Why do some people particularly reject the census?
Why do some people particularly reject the census?
Not many people really reject the census. The main reason is that these seven people are different from before. I have participated in six-person general education. Although I am not engaged in this job now, my relatives have also participated in the seven-person general education. Frankly speaking, there is no coordination among a few organizations and arrangements.

Generally, when there are six people, each person is responsible for his own area, and it is enough to fill out the form at home for the existing residents, which is usually one-time.

However, in recent years, the social and economic development has changed greatly, the mobility of people is large, and the separation of people and households is increasing. When seven people are involved, it is necessary not only to verify the population flow and the separation of households. The former is more common in new buildings, while the latter is more common in old communities. It is very troublesome to verify, so there will be many questions and repeated questions.

For example, if a person lives in community A and his household registration is in community B, when there are generally six people, you can go directly to community A to find a person, and community B can probably know the basic situation of this person, and everyone can ask at most once. There are seven people, probably not enough to ask once. Repeatedly asking about residence and household registration, it is strange not to be angry.

Therefore, the problem of organization and coordination, for example, it is said in the propaganda that the census will start in June 1 1, but it was actually carried out in September-June 10: it is necessary to enter the copy in advance. From a certain point of view, the census was completed on June 30th 165438+ 10/month, and the following table is based on it. The census of 1 65438+1October1actually refers to the entry of long and short tables, and the copy was completed before. Did you make it clear through publicity? number

One more thing: the design of the form entered by the system is flawed.

Take data indicators M5, M6 and M7 as examples. M6 does not reflect the situation that "the household registration was in other census communities within the jurisdiction at the time of identification". If the community or village Committee staff are ok, their information exchange will be better, but now those volunteers or property volunteers may make mistakes and repeat investigations and inquiries.

There are also three data indicators: M9, M 10, M 1 1. At this time, M 10 actually reflects the situation of "living in other census areas in this area at the time of identification", but it omits another situation: not living in the household, but living in other houses in this census area.

In this way, there is a problem when entering: for example, someone, 1, rents a neighbor's house or moves to a relative's house in the same census community. Then, after entering this household, the actual situation is that this person is not here, and M9 should be 1. But the following M 10 and M 1 1 cannot be selected. If you choose them, it is a logical mistake: you can't choose him to live in other census communities in your jurisdiction, nor can you say that he lives outside his jurisdiction. In this case, if you want to pass the audit, you can only interpret it yourself.

How to display and verify the system is hard to say, and it may have little impact. But for such a big thing, the setting of index data table needs to be scientific and rigorous.

Finally, there are shortcomings in the organization. There are not many volunteers participating in the six-person general class, and the seven-person general class is more complicated and the workload is greater, so many volunteers are recruited to join. However, the cultural literacy and discipline of these people are uneven, and it is estimated that the epidemic situation has also had an impact, resulting in insufficient centralized training.

Among the volunteers, student volunteers have strong ability to accept new things and are easy to operate. However, most people who participate in property management are social volunteers, security guards and property managers, and it is very difficult for them to operate the system. Typical, such as data upload, some people don't do location upload. In addition, the relationship between the property and the owners is already tense, and some property personnel and social volunteers lack mass work experience and communication and inquiry skills. In this context, the owners' antipathy is aggravated.

In short, the "seven-person plan" is of epoch-making significance, and the accuracy and scientificity of the data exceed that of the "six-person plan". It is a preview of the era of big data, which is complicated in itself. Coupled with the influence of social environment and epidemic situation, there are deficiencies in all aspects to varying degrees. People who refuse the census are not mainstream, but more tired of being asked and complaining, which is actually understandable.