1. Further clarify the evaluation criteria: the evaluation criteria should clearly explain what is a quality class, including classroom content, teaching methods, student participation, etc. If there is any ambiguity in the evaluation form, you can communicate with the relevant personnel. * * * is the same as the clear standard.
2. Provide more training guidance: It may be because the teacher's requirements for high-quality courses are not clear enough, or the corresponding teaching skills are lacking, which leads to the evaluation form being inconsistent with the actual situation. In view of this situation, professional training and guidance can be organized to help teachers better understand and master the essentials of quality classes.
3. Communicate with the evaluation agency: If the evaluation form is quite different from the actual situation and cannot be solved through internal adjustment, you can communicate with the evaluation agency. Provide relevant reasons and evidence, explain the irrationality of the evaluation form, and put forward reasonable suggestions in order to reach an understanding.
4. Establish a feedback mechanism: in the process of formulating the evaluation form, we should fully consider the feedback from teachers and teaching practice. A feedback mechanism can be established to collect teachers' opinions and suggestions regularly for the revision and optimization of evaluation standards.
In short, to solve the problem of inconsistency between high-quality courses and evaluation forms, we need real communication and understanding, and keep the flow and feedback of information, so as to better promote the improvement of teaching quality.