The first and second publicity shall be implemented by the EIA unit, and the owner had better cooperate. The third publicity was implemented by the Environmental Protection Bureau before the examination and approval, and has nothing to do with the owner and the EIA unit. It's just a legal procedure and a routine.
After the implementation of the first and second publicity, the EIA unit will issue a draft for submission to the Environmental Protection Bureau, and the Evaluation Center of the Environmental Protection Bureau will organize an expert meeting to make a technical evaluation of the report. At the review meeting, the owner should remember to be consistent with the EIA unit. After the evaluation, there will be some expert opinions, and the EIA unit will modify the opinions to form a draft for approval and report it to the Environmental Protection Bureau again. If supplementary information is needed, the owner also needs to cooperate. Then the owner needs to pay an evaluation fee to the evaluation center, and the rest is waiting for approval.
The word "listen" is very vague. The second publicity can take the form of hearing, but it is not necessary. Will the judge use the word "hearing"?