In fact, many students have reflected that the most difficult thing in the public examination is composition writing. There are so many words that it is difficult to put all the words together. The test composition score is mediocre every time, and it is difficult to improve. I can't even finish writing my composition. I patched up arguments and made them up. After reading them through, I found that I couldn't convince myself. Some language expressions in the sensory argument are too far-fetched, the argument logic is chaotic, and the arguments and reasoning are insufficient ... These are all students. In fact, the commonly used methods of argumentative writing are examples and reasoning, which are combined with each other and used flexibly in the process of argumentative writing. Grasping the argument can be divided into three steps:

First of all, show the argument and make an appropriate transition. Mastering the method of argumentative writing can help you organize your language faster and better and complete your argumentative writing. The first step of a good argument is to put forward a correct and clear argument, which requires everyone to draw appropriate ideas according to the stem and materials. When you have a good argument, you can simply explain it and then transition to the following example or rational language expression, especially when the argument is abstract, which is similar to the first step of explanatory comprehensive analysis.

Second, around the argument, concrete analysis. When the key words of a paragraph are successfully extracted through the opening argument, it is necessary to analyze the key words of the argument, and the analysis process can mainly be carried out by examples and reasoning. Examples can come from news hotspots and classic allusions that you usually watch, but if the accumulation is poor, you must use the materials flexibly. Candidates can use different methods, such as synonym or synonym replacement, sentence inversion, abbreviation and expansion, and information extraction, to draw inspiration from the materials in the materials and enrich their articles. Candidates can express materials in their own language, which can be favored by examiners; The second way is to choose the reason and analyze the phenomenon results around keywords; The problem of poor status quo; Reason; Harm; Meaning; Necessity, etc. Or quote famous sayings and aphorisms, national principles and policies, principle effects, etc. It's all reasonable and can be written. Generally speaking, there are various angles of analysis around the topic, and you can choose the language that is more suitable for the argument at will. Examples and reasoning can be used alone or in any combination to show examiners rich argumentation methods and language expressions.

Third, according to logic, summarize the rebate. "The foundation is not strong, and the ground shakes." When we can take the first two steps in a down-to-earth manner, the last step will move forward naturally and steadily. A complete argument logic must be complete, and finally, it is necessary to summarize the views and return the arguments. Without this step, no matter how well we do ahead, we will all lose and fall short. At the end of the argument, we must sum up and reiterate it. Of course, we can also put forward countermeasures for the problems in the sub-argument at the end. Finally, a complete sub-argument writing of total score and total logic is formed.

Preparing for the exam is a long-term process, especially for composition argumentation. The accumulation of material language was not built in a day. I hope that the majority of candidates will be calm, not arrogant and impetuous, and will not accumulate thousands of miles. At ordinary times, they will read more and accumulate more materials, optimize their language, show rich contents and diverse argumentation methods in their argumentation, and make articles on the next level.