Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Education and training - Will you choose to resign and prepare for the full-time civil service examination?
Will you choose to resign and prepare for the full-time civil service examination?
It's hard to say, it depends on your actual situation-it is closely related to your learning ability, preparation environment, the matching degree between education and major, and economic foundation.

But the subject need not be overly anxious, I can understand your feelings very well. I have participated in many public exams, career preparation and even project students' exams, and almost every time I am the first in the written exam. Of course, many times I didn't go to the interview, because every time I rode a donkey to find a horse, I just wanted to try my hand.

I have been ashore for five years now, so I will talk to you about my thoughts as a person who has been there.

As we all know, the civil service examination is essentially a competency-based examination, not a knowledge-based examination (especially a line test). It's still a little different from Gong Ji-centered vocational examination.

Moreover, the ability is difficult to improve in the short term-many people take naked and written exams with a try mentality, and finally miss the interview by a few points. So I boasted everywhere: you see, the public exam is not difficult. I almost entered the interview without studying. If I am lucky, I may have passed.

It's okay for such people to cheat outsiders who don't know how to do it. I laugh at anyone who tells me that.

Do you think that if you study, you will definitely be admitted? Do you believe me if I say that you may do worse in the exam after half a year?

This is really not an alarmist. In my opinion, the direction of the public exam is more important than hard work-if you can't touch the inherent law of the exam during the preparation process and can't extricate yourself from the sea of questions, then I'm sorry, the high probability of meeting you is failure.

Take walking test as an example: common sense judgment, speech understanding and expression, quantitative relationship, judgment reasoning, data analysis. Every module is a test of ability-some people say it is wrong, what happened to common sense? Then let me ask your brother, the knowledge points that common sense can test include thousands of knowledge points in many fields. Can you remember all the contents? If you don't have the ability to summarize and contact knowledge, how can you ensure that you get those scores in the examination room? After all, the questions in the exam often depend on your analysis and judgment, and rely on the connection of relevant knowledge points to get the answer.

Another example is speech understanding and expression. This module is divided into two parts: understanding and expression. Each part has corresponding problem-solving rules, but the core ability of the investigation is the same: the ability to quickly understand the intention of the other party (leader, colleague or written document) in a short time is very consistent with the civil servant's own work.

Not to mention judgment reasoning including two judgments and two inferences (definition judgment, logical judgment, graphic reasoning and analogy reasoning), these four sub-modules test four kinds of thinking abilities corresponding to four different ways of thinking.

The quantitative relationship used to be divided into numerical reasoning and mathematical operation, but now only the mathematical operation part is left. Many people say that this thing is just an Olympic math problem. Yes, everyone knows that it is an Olympic math problem, but it is useless. You have to know how to solve the Olympic math problem, and it's a quick decision-15. It takes you two hours to answer all the questions correctly, so it's better to answer 10 in 20 minutes. Walking test is a stress test, so you must give the correct answer as soon as possible.

Similarly, there is data analysis, that is to say, not only knowledge. The key is the ability to use this knowledge to solve problems. This ability is developed in the process of long-term learning and cannot be achieved overnight.

But there is a problem: you will never get these abilities without studying. Although you may not be able to make progress in your studies, you can at least make progress. Therefore, you must prepare for the exam, and you can't take the exam with the mentality of hitting the Universiade, otherwise the result can only be "focusing on participation."

Regarding the application, I came across an article in the classic PDF format of "80+ Great God" and applied repeatedly (including people around me). With this article, you can throw away all the textbooks of China chalk, which are thick and long and not necessarily practical for people who are dizzy. I can share this with you if anyone needs it.

Ok, after talking about the essence of the public examination, let's talk about whether the subject should be prepared full-time.

According to your description, I feel that you are not confident about preparing for the job now. Besides, you don't like your present job, and you really want to quit and go all out to prepare for the exam. But you have passion, but there is no guarantee that you will get in. You are afraid that there is no way out after failure. To put it bluntly, I am not confident in my examination ability and my job-hunting qualification. You're afraid you have nothing. And this is probably because your family conditions and your personal economic conditions can not give you strong support.