I think early education should be divided into family situations. Adults who take care of babies (old people, nannies, mothers, etc.). ) I have no concept of parenting, I am not good at or actively learning scientific parenting knowledge, and I don't understand the law of children's growth. Then, going to early education still has a certain positive effect. No matter how bad the early education center is, it will also do some targeted activities according to the law of children's development, which is a kind of compensation for adults who don't understand scientific parenting. To make an inappropriate analogy, early education is like a dessert, not a necessity for human body. The quality of dessert and the specific situation of users affect the result. For example, for a hungry person, dessert can quickly replenish energy, just like a person who has no concept of parenting goes to early education. For a person with normal nutritional status, dessert is not only not a necessity, but even brings health risks because of its quality. Of course, there are also benefits, that is, dessert brings the enjoyment of sensory taste buds, just like the vanity and comfort brought by early education. But if you choose inferior desserts, it may bring more health risks. After investigating various high-end and mid-range early education institutions, it is found that the professional threshold is too low, and those so-called majors are only for people who have no concept of parenting at all. Generally speaking, if you are hungry, you can eat dessert, but if you are too expensive, you can eat rice, which is equally healthy and makes no difference. If you have money and enjoy the sensory experience, you can eat it, but choose quality desserts.