On the morning of August 24th, Shantou Intermediate People's Court and Shantou Chenghai Court implemented coordinated execution, dispatched machinery and manpower to remove obstacles, and delivered the factory building of Guangdong Jiada Early Education Technology Co., Ltd. located in Waipu Industrial Zone of Chenghai District to the buyer for use. The official account of "Shantou Court" WeChat WeChat conducted a live video broadcast of the whole implementation process. Shantou Intermediate People's Court and Chenghai Court carried out coordinated enforcement actions.

Case playback:

The case of financial loan contract dispute and private lending dispute between Cai Mosheng, a branch of a bank in Chenghai, Guangdong Province, and Guangdong Jiada Early Education Technology Co., Ltd., Jia and Nong was settled by the mediation judgment of Chenghai Court. Because the defendant failed to fulfill the repayment obligations stipulated in the effective legal documents, the plaintiff applied to the court for enforcement. After 1 hours of demolition and cleaning, the obstacles in front of the two gates of Jiada Company were completely removed. Last year1October 20th 10, Chenghai District Court ruled to seal up and detain 22 injection molding machines and 4 plastic shredders owned by Jiada Company.

Jiada Company's factory building in Chenghai Waipu Industrial Zone was auctioned twice. Because all the applicants refused to accept paying debts in kind, the court ruled to sell the property according to law.

On April 5 this year, an architectural decoration company in Guangzhou won the above property at the highest price 10745 yuan.

65438+ Last year1on the afternoon of October 26th, when the executive officers of Chenghai Court went to Jiada Company to seal it up, they found that the front door and back door of the company were blocked by others and could not be executed.

Huang Mouqun, an outsider in the case, obstructed the execution at the door, claiming that Jia owed him nearly 654.38 billion yuan in loans and interest, and Jia had promised to own his factory and machinery and equipment in the factory, so the court had no right to take compulsory measures.

The person subjected to execution explained the law to Huang Mouqun on the spot and told him that his rights should be solved through legal channels and the consequences of obstructing execution, but the other party did not listen to the advice, which made it impossible to seal up the machinery and equipment on the spot.

Since then, the court twice organized the police officers of the Executive Board and the judicial police team to go to the scene to detain the equipment, which was strongly obstructed by Huang Mouqun and others.