The general view is:
Viewpoint 1: The early church brought many problems, so it is better to let the baby grow up freely.
Reason:
1. I think teaching a child too much is tantamount to depriving him of a happy childhood. If you teach your child more things, it will inevitably put more pressure on your child, take up too much time for your baby, and hinder his development in other aspects.
2. The baby knows more, and going to school in the future will also bring many problems, such as not attending classes and being tired of learning, because he knows more than others and is complacent.
3. Teaching a child something too early will limit his imagination, creative development and so on.
Conclusion: If there are so many problems caused by "early education", it is better to give up "early education" and let children grow better naturally. When we were young, our parents didn't give us the so-called "early education". Isn't it different to be an adult? This is the strongest evidence that "early education" is unnecessary.
Viewpoint 2: The sooner you start "early education", the better, and the more you teach, the better, so that your baby will be smarter.
Reason:
1. There is a big gap between children teaching and not teaching. The more they teach, the more they know, and the better for their development.
From the day your baby is born, you should always tell him everything you see in various ways, especially teach him to read, read, draw and play the piano as soon as possible.
3. "Early education" will make children smarter, which is one of the essential things for children to grow up.
Viewpoint 3: Although "early education" is good, it depends on whether the baby is willing to accept it. If the baby is unwilling to accept it, "early education" is an empty talk, and only give up.
Seeing other people's children learn this and that, some parents will teach their babies this and that, but they can't learn at all. Seeing him like this, parents should be worried, but there is nothing they can do. Although I know that "early education" will have a very good influence on children's growth, I really don't know where to start "early education" for children.
Correct understanding:
As can be seen from the above point of view, when it comes to "early education", many parents mistakenly think that it is teaching, and equate the word "teaching" with the word "indoctrination", which is more related to literacy, reading and learning. So "teaching" and "not teaching" have become a pair of contradictions. Many parents got into a fight because of these two arguments, so all contradictions and conflicts escalated around the word "teaching". In fact, the key reason for this situation is that many parents have a wrong understanding of the word "early education". It seems that the above three statements about "early education" all sound reasonable, but they are all extreme. It is an indisputable fact that "early education" is of great significance in the baby's growth. There is no doubt that "early education" is an important nutrient from the heart during the baby's growth. There is no dispute between "teaching" and "not teaching". The only thing worth noting is to correctly understand the true meaning of "early education" and adopt the most suitable way to give the baby the most suitable "early education" content.
The article comes from www.0371xuexi.com/46.html.