The so-called "excessive early education" is actually incorrect. Unless the questioner is misled by the domestic early education center and thinks that "early education" means learning piano, reciting ancient poems, practicing arithmetic and reading English, there will be "excessive early education"; In fact, when children just open their eyes, you ring the bell, which is early education; When a child is sleepy, lighting a musical star lamp is early education; Children can climb, and putting a ball in front of him is early education; Children have teeth, and it is early education to teach him to dig rice with a spoon to make rice grains all over the ground; The child is a toddler, so you patiently accompany him to push the cart. This is early education; Children socialize, grab toys or be robbed of toys. It can appease children and let them play together ... this is early education. Real early education can't be too much. So in fact, there is no so-called "excessive early education" in this world. I guess the questioner is asking about early education in learning knowledge. First of all, parents should have a general concept. What preschool children need to master is learning ability, such as the ability to recognize graphic information (why does your child always read the questions on the paper wrong? He is not "too careless" as you criticized, but lacks the training of reading picture books as a child), patience and concentration (why is your child always distracted in class? He is not "playful and unconscious" as you criticized, but he peeled too many fruits in his childhood, which caused his brain to be slow to respond to reading such a low-stimulus thing. How many books you can recite and how many words you can write is not a hard indicator of IQ at all. Parents should be patient. Can't rush to plant the seedlings directly into the ground and pour manure for irrigation? Just respect the law of children's growth and give help in time. By the time the child learns, his learning efficiency will be very high, and he will soon catch up with or even surpass his peers in "early education". When a child learns an ancient poem at the age of 3, it may need to be repeated dozens or hundreds of times, while at the age of 7, it may only need a dozen times (there are related experiments abroad, so I won't search). So why force a child to work hard at an inappropriate age to do something that he still doesn't feel happy? (As @ Kunyu said, if a gifted child is willing to teach himself, parents certainly don't have to stop him. Compared with foreign early childhood education: In Germany, children can go to kindergarten at the age of 3 for a period of 3 years. In these three years, they will visit the police station and learn how to call the police; Visit the fire police station to learn how to extinguish and avoid fires; Visit the city government, get to know the mayor and see how he serves the citizens; Go by tram and learn to remember the route home; Go to the supermarket with teachers to buy things, learn to pay and choose goods ... after 3 years, they have a preliminary viability.