With the "double reduction" policy gradually implemented, normalized and severely cracked down in various places, countless teaching and training institutions closed down, transferred jobs, laid off employees, and even ran away, and the survival format of teaching and training practitioners was in jeopardy.
According to incomplete statistics, there are over 700,000 educational and training institutions in China, with nearly k 12 employees.
Such a huge industry group suddenly seemed to be pressed the delete button at once, and everyone was dumbfounded and at a loss.
At this time, there are still some practitioners who have a little illusion that after one and a half years, it is impossible to say that the policy will be loosened, or that the industry boom will be like South Korea because it just needs to come back, so it still wants to continue or play the edge ball.
Die before it is too late!
From the perspective of long-term stability in the next few decades, the state believes that this is a major issue related to national survival and national security, and it is a policy that must be resolutely implemented.
In other words, this is a serious Zheng Zhi problem, not a simple economic problem. No one should underestimate the seriousness, crackdown and law enforcement of the country to this industry.
The education and training industry of K 12 is yellow, but as an industry with thousands of years' history, how can it disappear?
Teaching and training is only a small part of the education industry, and there are still many opportunities for those who really love education to transform.
Many To B institutions have given many teaching and training institutions the direction of transformation, such as vocational education, science and technology education, quality education and family education.
These all look very good, but it is difficult to be used as a landing plan for the transformation of the teaching and training industry. Because it is basically not just needed, the market volume is limited.
For example, the track of science and technology education is incompatible with cultural training institutions. The core of training institutions is subject teachers, and the new track needs brand-new teachers, brand-new enrollment teams and even a lot of investment in software systems. ?
A man standing on the first floor saw the street now. Standing on the third floor, you can see more streets. Standing on the tenth floor, you can see all the streets clearly.
Therefore, we need to jump out of the existing thinking framework and look at the solution of the problem from a broader and higher perspective.
The so-called transformation or career change is actually to change the orientation through changes in industries, enterprises or occupations.
It is safest to change one or two of the three elements during the transformation. You'd better change it, because it adapts the fastest.
For example, institutions can change from culture to quality, change the direction of the industry, completely retain core resources such as internal structure and post preparation, and make a comeback.
The red part of the above picture is not allowed to be done, and it is slowly in the place where people are retired, but the green part can be well considered.
Each piece can be a good foothold, even the core competitiveness, and will be widely welcomed. Therefore, in this vast field of education, you and I have great potential.
But I still want to advise utilitarianism to enter the field of education and training and leave quickly. The next twenty years will be a good day to be an educator sincerely.
It doesn't matter if you can't teach. We can always be educators. Come on!