My hometown is in the countryside, and I go home every National Day and Spring Festival. There is a child about 4 years old next door. The father of the child is a monk all the year round (don't be surprised). The mother of the child never came back after giving birth. Children usually live with grandparents and are typical left-behind children. It is said that the child is very clever. Where do people praise the most?

Her grandparents also sent her to early childhood classes and kindergartens, except that she didn't learn English, just like the children in the city. But no one praised her painting, singing, dancing or other aspects, and her grandparents did not praise her advantages in this respect, but mainly praised her "advantages" in "interpersonal communication" ability. Why is this? The explanation I can think of is that her grandparents' neighbors don't have a deep understanding of "painting, singing and dancing" in their own knowledge system, and they don't think that artistic expression ability is an important quality of a person, which leads them to unilaterally ignore the cultivation of these abilities and only pay attention to "interpersonal communication" ability, because in rural areas, these two abilities are still very useful. No attention, no input, no input, no output. A farmer in his fifties and sixties can't understand art with a computer, but most people in their thirties and forties who are aware of the importance of artistic quality education in mainstream cities work outside the home, so children's investment in this education may be very small, even close to zero. Compared with parents in the city, we have invested energy and funds to let our children learn English, painting, handicrafts, Go and dance, and cultivate their quality in this respect. The result is naturally that children in cities are much higher than one in these abilities.