Let's just say.
Canon, the advertising effect in China is quite good! In Japan, fujifilm did not lose to Canon. . .
At that time, F3 1FD monopolized the sales of card machines in the first seven months. . .
As far as imaging quality is concerned, what you said should all be from F 100FD, not to mention F200EXR. . .
The sharpness of P6000 center is similar to that of F 100FD, but it is almost the same as F 100FD at high ISO. . .
Don't think that F 100FD positioning is not high and imaging is poor. . .
The F200EXR with the latest pixel merging technology is beyond the reach of all brands. . .
F200EXR, the center sharpness is equivalent to F 100FD, but the layering is better than F 100FD. . .
There are still some under high ISO, especially below 400- 1600 and even as high as 3200. . .
Which card machine have you seen can reach 1600 with ISO?
Usually under the rule of ISO800, it is a mess here. . .
Compared with Panasonic's flagship LX3, the F200EXR has won a great victory. . .
However, it is a pity that the small aperture of F200EXR sacrifices the faster shutter speed, but this shortcoming can be made up by a tripod. . .
The shutter speed difference between F3.2 and F2.0 is 1.7 times, which is the only deficiency of F200EXR. As for the blurring effect of the card machine, F2.0 is of little use, just a headache.
I recommend you to choose F200EXR. This machine can use 1600ISO at 6M, and the image is very sharp, which is incomparable to all card machines. .
Let me talk about the background blur effect. F2.0 to F2.8 are not very good here, but F3.2 has achieved a good blurring effect. . . The small aperture sacrifices the higher shutter speed and produces a good blur effect. Judge for yourself. . .
F2.8 and F3.3 of the card machine are almost on a horizontal line, so this need not be emphasized. As for the LX3 of Panasonic F2.0 aperture, I ask you, is it meaningful except for beautiful data?
I have many photos comparing LX3 and F200EXR, all of which were taken in the same scene and under the same ISO. You can intuitively feel how LX3 was killed by F200EXR.
My email address is wenranjabber@yeah.net, and I can send you a photo.
Besides, you want high-definition photography? Don't be ridiculous. Even if the camera reaches the parameter of 1080P, the image is poor and grainy. Stop joking. . .
This is really the first step, and there is no need to pursue it. . .
My own technology is good, which is used to develop technology and CCD. Which high-end camera with good imaging do you see has high-definition photography?
Let it go. If you want to play this game, you have to be on camera. . .
You really have no choice but Fuji F200EXR. ...