Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Early education courses - Will learning English in the first grade of primary school really "win" at the starting line?
Will learning English in the first grade of primary school really "win" at the starting line?
Personally, it is completely unnecessary to offer English classes from the first grade of primary school. The reason for this is the following:

The first point: The synchronous teaching of English and Chinese Pinyin in Senior One is easy to be confused. At present, kindergartens do not advocate cultural learning, and all subjects in the first grade of primary school start from scratch. In the process of Chinese teaching in the first grade of primary school, the most headache for teachers and parents is pinyin learning. If English classes are offered from the first grade of primary school, children are required to learn ABC at the same time before they understand pinyin aoe, because they all look the same and are easily confused. The final result is that I didn't learn English well and I didn't learn Chinese well.

The second point: for most people, English may not be used for life. Everyone should have a deep understanding of this. For example, many ordinary people, after finishing their studies, engage in the simplest and most basic work, then get married step by step, have children, watch their children get married and help them take care of them, and life is over. I never found English useful, never used English, and never even gave him a chance to speak English.

The third point: it occupies the study time and play time of children's other subjects. At present, according to the curriculum plan, there are 26 classes in the first and second grades of primary school, 5 classes a day from Monday to Thursday and 6 classes on Friday (the last class is a class activity). If English classes are taught from the first grade, at least two classes a week (if it doesn't work, there will be no classes), which will inevitably crowd out other subjects. Other languages, mathematics, sports, music, fine arts, morality and rule of law (original ideology and morality), science (original nature), etc. , who is better?

In addition, if you want to learn English well, you must review, train and consolidate after class in addition to the classroom, which will be effective. In this way, it will also take up children's play time.

The fourth point: the importance of English is gradually being pulled down from the altar. In the final analysis, English is only a tool to communicate with foreigners who use English. With the development of science and technology, real-time translation software has appeared, which can fully meet the daily needs of both English-Chinese translation and Chinese-English translation. Moreover, in the upcoming college entrance examination reform, the English scores in the college entrance examination are likely to decline. Of course, except for a few people who want to study abroad, emigrate, or aspire to engage in diplomatic translation, they can learn English from birth. There are specialized training institutions, but this is a personal matter, and there is no need to kidnap everyone to accompany them.