Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Early education courses - 2.3 million bought a house, lived for half a year, and the door was smashed. What if the original owner suddenly goes back on his word?
2.3 million bought a house, lived for half a year, and the door was smashed. What if the original owner suddenly goes back on his word?
The problem of house has always been a matter of great concern to everyone, especially in the city where you work. Even if you have your own home in this city, you should have a house of your own. For foreigners, it is not in vain to spend all their savings and save a house after years of hard work, so that they can have a reliance and a harbor for their hearts in this city. But if you can't live in a house, it won't taste good in your heart.

This has happened in Hangzhou before. Mr. Wang worked hard for many years and spent 2.3 million yuan to buy a second-hand house. After living for half a year, suddenly one day, the door lock was broken and things were thrown out and smashed. From this day on, it became a problem to live in a new house. What happened? Let's have a look.

The house bought by Mr. Wang is in the Fourth Qianjiang Hospital in Hangzhou. The reporter followed Mr. Wang to the floor where he bought a house. It can be seen that all his daily necessities are thrown in the corridor, some things have been smashed, the door lock of the house has been pried open, and the monitoring installed at the door has also been smashed. Seeing such a situation, Mr. Wang explained to reporters that he was a foreigner. He has worked hard in Hangzhou for many years and has never had his own house. Now he has a lot of savings. He bought this house from the original landlord, Ms. Yu, for 2.3 million yuan six months ago, and now it is a problem to live in it.

Mr. Wang said that he did not pay the full amount at that time, but paid 60% of the house price. The two sides also signed a contract, but the transfer has been delayed. Because the house is back to the new house, the landlord only got the house certificate six months ago. According to the contract, if you have obtained three certificates, you should complete the transaction, but the landlord has been delaying the transfer.

It turns out that the house price in Hangzhou has soared in the past six months, and the original landlord has to pay 165438+ 10,000 yuan more, which means that the house price has become 3.3 million yuan. Mr. Wang is unhappy, because after paying part of the house price, the three certificates have not come down, and the landlord promised to let himself live in first, and the transfer can wait, so Mr. Wang moved in first. now

Regarding the demand for price increase, Mr. Wang said that because the house is a commodity, if the price increases, it is necessary to increase the money. According to this statement, if the house has fallen in price, can it be refunded or reduced? Moreover, the house sales contract has been signed and the contract has come into effect. As for the lack of transfer and three certificates, the landlord gave it to Ms. Yu. Dissatisfied with the landlord's money increase, Mr. Wang sued the landlord.

The judgment of the court came out, confirming the validity of the contract between the two parties. The landlord should continue to transfer the ownership to Mr. Wang and complete the handover of the house. However, the court ruled that the contradiction between Mr. Wang and Ms. Yu had not been resolved. Ms. Yu pried open the door lock of the house when Mr. Wang was not at home and threw all Mr. Wang's things out. Some things were broken and the locks were changed. Then the reporter began to try to contact the landlord, Ms. Yu. Ms. Yu said that in order for Mr. Wang to apply for the three certificates, a fare increase was proposed at that time, and Mr. Wang agreed. He also went to her house to negotiate, not actively, and showed the chat record with Mr. Wang. But Mr. Wang said that he did promise to increase the money, but he disagreed with this figure, because Ms. Yu thought he agreed, and now the evidence awarded by the court is insufficient. At that time, he only said appropriate compensation, not 165438+ 10,000.

Mr. Wang thinks he can live now, but the landlord's practice of throwing out his personal belongings feels a bit inappropriate. Then the reporter consulted a lawyer, who said it was legal to let Mr. Wang move out of the house at this time, but the landlord should not destroy Mr. Wang's things in the process of moving out. If anything is damaged in the process of moving out, Mr. Wang has the right to ask the landlord for compensation. Finally, the landlord appealed again, but Mr. Wang could only move out of the house temporarily.

What I want to say is that there is something wrong with the landlord's approach. The signing of the house sales contract proves that the transaction has been completed. You can't increase the price just because there is no transfer, and you can't throw other people's things out. However, there are many such examples in life. It is a good thing that house prices have gone up, but we can't lose trust in others because of greed, and we can't take away other people's achievements because of interests.

Then, do you think Mr. Wang should give the landlord more money? Please leave your opinion on this matter in the comments section.