Kindergarten has introduced a new model, and the high price can't convince parents. Why did you say leave me a quota? High prices can't stop parents from trying to shape their children's hearts. Some good kindergartens have introduced this innovative model, which is even "demanding". Many parents reacted strongly, "Leave me a quota".

Some parents also said, "I will try my best to give my children a good education. There must be an expensive reason. Children will certainly learn a lot from it, and there is no doubt that there is a big difference. "

Naturally, some parents disagree with this statement. In their view, "it is not practical to report this kind of kindergarten to children. Children basically play in the nursery. Where can they really teach so much professional knowledge? That was after primary school and secondary school. "

How should we view the differences between them?

First of all, what we can establish is that the argument between parents here can't help children only by relying on some ways that parents think are meaningless.

However, some parents think that this way is beneficial to children, and children can learn some professional knowledge more or less from it. In fact, the independence and usefulness mentioned here is superficial, because it is not an independent factor that can decide whether it is good for children.

If children are smart and interested in English, brain development or other related knowledge, then they are sure that members will spend their energy on learning and training and get positive feedback.

On the other hand, if children are not interested in this aspect, no matter how clever they are, they may not learn any professional knowledge. In addition, what needs to be established is that if some kindergartens are more devoted and professional, in early childhood education, teachers will work hard to teach, children will study hard and children will certainly make progress.

Then, if the kindergarten only shouts "parent-child early education", "brain development" and "English exercise", after deducting high expenses, it will only teach children some simple words or sentences to deal with them, and spend most of the time playing, then this way is meaningless. Therefore, whether the innovative model works or not depends on whether the children themselves are interested and diligent, and whether the management rules and regulations of kindergartens and teachers' technical majors are the main factors that cannot be ignored.

Another way of playing parent-child early education

Nowadays, in order to let their children walk in front of others, parents bite their teeth and let their children go to outside tutoring institutions for training. Even five or six-year-old children need to step into this road. Naturally, it is because young children are difficult to teach, and correspondingly, the training fee is also very expensive, which is very common in the current market, and most parents are willing to pay such a price.

However, some parents are under great pressure to deal with this. In that case, why can't parents give their children early education? Actually, it is not. Now the technology on the Internet is developed. There are many free English early education center courses online, and some need to be purchased, but the prices are very cheap, sometimes one hundred yuan can solve them.

Parents should find these teaching videos for their children and guide them to learn and train. Nature also stipulates that children have strong self-discipline ability, which is also a good opportunity for parents to shape their children's self-study ability and learning autonomy. Smart parents will grasp this.

In addition, I hope parents will pay attention to the fact that early parent-child education is far less than the key to shaping children's active learning ability and initiative. After all, these are the most basic things. If the children are lacking, even the parent-child early education for children is difficult to produce results.