Many candidates have such troubles in interview skills. What kind of answer does the examiner like? How to answer questions will refresh the examiner? What is a conventional language? Please imagine that in the interview examination room, our candidates thought very comprehensively and made it very clear, but because there were too many cliches, the examiner was disgusted, and it was done. First cause effect? That would be very wrong. So here is a brief summary for the students, hoping to clear the small mines on the way forward for the students. Of course, the words of disgust vary from examiner to examiner. Here is just a summary of what I feel unwilling to listen to, for reference only.

Small Mine 1: The leader entrusted me with such an important task, which is the trust of the organization and a test for me.

It usually appears in the theme of planning, organization and coordination. So all the above tasks are in the title? What about you? It is suggested that candidates do not have to be confused, improve the examiner's understanding of the cost, and come straight to the point.

Small example of lightning protection: In order to further strengthen the legal awareness of the masses and improve the ability and legal quality of residents to safeguard their rights according to law, a community is going to organize staff to carry out publicity activities on laws, policies and regulations within its jurisdiction. If you were in charge of this organization, how would you carry it out?

Get off to a good start: under the background of ruling the country by law in an all-round way, make community residents better understand legal knowledge, enhance their political acumen, improve their ability to defend their rights according to law and their legal quality, create a good atmosphere in which the whole people consciously respect, learn, abide by and use the law, and ensure the security and stability of the community.

Look at the last paragraph carefully. The first two sentences show that this activity is not groundless, but because of the background of comprehensively governing the country according to law. Then let's get back to the point. What's the point of this publicity campaign once it is successful? First of all, with the popularization of laws and regulations, people who didn't know the law or the law had a certain understanding of the law through this activity. That's even deeper. For community work, there is also the scope and importance of informing and publicizing the construction of a legal society. Every sentence is related to improving citizens' ability to defend their rights according to law, so please work hard on the exam questions during the preparation period.

Small Mine No.2: I must sum up this work and report to the leader in time.

As we all know, you must have a conclusion when answering questions. Many candidates regard this sentence as the golden rule of planning, organizing, coordinating and responding to situations. When there is nothing to say, they will summarize the report, but sometimes it will arouse the examiner's disgust. Should this conclusion be said? If it is, I suggest that it depends on the situation. If what you said before is very rich, don't say it or say less, for example? After the activity, the relevant materials will be filed for future reference. ? If you haven't said too much or even some dry goods, you need to think clearly. Are there any points not mentioned just now that can be added to the conclusion, such as? Due to the thoughtlessness in the preparatory stage, something went wrong in a link in the activity just now (the missing point you just thought of). Although it was corrected in time, it also shows that my work is not detailed enough. In the next preparation, I must be more cautious and comprehensive. ? In this way, turning the crisis into an opportunity, the examiner who originally thought that you did not consider the question comprehensively or did not answer the question thoroughly will feel bright at the moment. This candidate knows how to think after the activity and deserves praise. Naturally, you have a high score.

Small Mine No.3: This problem should be viewed from two aspects/dialectically analyzed/on the one hand, on the other hand,

This kind of small mine is the most common in comprehensive analysis problems, but it is the most common mistake made by students. Dialectical? Analyzing questions is indeed a common way of thinking, but when it is used to express personal views, it will make the examiner feel your attitude and your views for a long time, and have a feeling of neutrality and not wanting to express his position.

A small example of lightning protection: news clients use big data technology to understand users' reading habits and analyze users' preferences according to each user's online browsing records, and then push a large number of similar news to users in time. What do you think of this?

Maybe some candidates will use the small mine at first, but isn't there a better answer? For example:? . This targeted information push can easily satisfy people's interests and preferences for different information, which is the progress brought by new technologies. But at the same time, it also brings some worrying concerns on many levels. Is it necessary to standardize this kind of news push behavior? In fact, you look at it dialectically in two, but you didn't wear that hat, but you made your point more direct and put it nicely.